vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Texas Pacific Land Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($211.6M vs $120.9M, roughly 1.8× Sprout Social, Inc.). On growth, Texas Pacific Land Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.9% vs 12.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Sprout Social, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs 10.2%).

Sprout Social, Inc. is a technology company that runs a social media management platform. A public company headquartered in Chicago, it was founded in 2010 by Justyn Howard, Aaron Rankin, Gil Lara, and Peter Soung.

The Texas Pacific Land Corporation is a publicly traded real estate operating company with its administrative office in Dallas, Texas. Owning over 880,000 acres (3,600 km2) in 20 West Texas counties, TPL is among the largest private landowners in the state of Texas. It was previously organized as a publicly traded trust taxed as a corporation, and operated under the name Texas Pacific Land Trust.

SPT vs TPL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TPL
TPL
1.8× larger
TPL
$211.6M
$120.9M
SPT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TPL
TPL
+1.0% gap
TPL
13.9%
12.9%
SPT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
SPT
SPT
Annualised
SPT
11.8%
10.2%
TPL

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Revenue
$120.9M
$211.6M
Net Profit
$123.3M
Gross Margin
77.6%
Operating Margin
-9.0%
70.5%
Net Margin
58.3%
Revenue YoY
12.9%
13.9%
Net Profit YoY
4.2%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.18
$-8.59

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$120.9M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$115.6M
$203.1M
Q2 25
$111.8M
$187.5M
Q1 25
$109.3M
$196.0M
Q4 24
$107.1M
$185.8M
Q3 24
$102.6M
$173.6M
Q2 24
$99.4M
$172.3M
Q1 24
$96.8M
$174.1M
Net Profit
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$123.3M
Q3 25
$-9.4M
$121.2M
Q2 25
$-12.0M
$116.1M
Q1 25
$-11.2M
$120.7M
Q4 24
$118.4M
Q3 24
$-17.1M
$106.6M
Q2 24
$-16.9M
$114.6M
Q1 24
$-13.6M
$114.4M
Gross Margin
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
77.6%
Q3 25
77.7%
Q2 25
77.7%
Q1 25
77.3%
Q4 24
78.1%
Q3 24
77.4%
Q2 24
77.5%
Q1 24
76.8%
Operating Margin
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
-9.0%
70.5%
Q3 25
-7.9%
73.4%
Q2 25
-11.0%
76.6%
Q1 25
-10.2%
76.6%
Q4 24
-12.8%
76.7%
Q3 24
-16.4%
73.4%
Q2 24
-16.6%
77.3%
Q1 24
-13.7%
78.1%
Net Margin
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
58.3%
Q3 25
-8.1%
59.7%
Q2 25
-10.7%
61.9%
Q1 25
-10.3%
61.6%
Q4 24
63.7%
Q3 24
-16.6%
61.4%
Q2 24
-17.0%
66.5%
Q1 24
-14.0%
65.7%
EPS (diluted)
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$-0.18
$-8.59
Q3 25
$-0.16
$5.27
Q2 25
$-0.21
$5.05
Q1 25
$-0.19
$5.24
Q4 24
$-0.25
$5.14
Q3 24
$-0.30
$4.63
Q2 24
$-0.30
$4.98
Q1 24
$-0.24
$4.97

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$95.3M
$144.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$40.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$203.4M
$1.5B
Total Assets
$523.1M
$1.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.20×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$95.3M
$144.8M
Q3 25
$90.6M
$531.8M
Q2 25
$101.5M
$543.9M
Q1 25
$100.9M
$460.4M
Q4 24
$86.4M
$369.8M
Q3 24
$82.9M
$533.9M
Q2 24
$80.9M
$894.7M
Q1 24
$69.2M
$837.1M
Total Debt
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$40.0M
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$25.0M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$203.4M
$1.5B
Q3 25
$194.1M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$184.6M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$175.3M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$166.6M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$158.1M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$152.1M
$1.2B
Q1 24
$147.3M
$1.1B
Total Assets
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$523.1M
$1.6B
Q3 25
$481.4M
$1.5B
Q2 25
$422.9M
$1.4B
Q1 25
$424.7M
$1.4B
Q4 24
$428.3M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$388.8M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$393.6M
$1.3B
Q1 24
$389.9M
$1.3B
Debt / Equity
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
0.20×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.15×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$10.9M
$113.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$9.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
8.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.92×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$39.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$10.9M
$113.7M
Q3 25
$9.3M
$154.6M
Q2 25
$5.1M
$120.9M
Q1 25
$18.1M
$156.7M
Q4 24
$4.1M
$126.6M
Q3 24
$9.0M
$118.6M
Q2 24
$2.1M
$98.3M
Q1 24
$11.2M
$147.2M
Free Cash Flow
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
$9.9M
Q3 25
$8.5M
Q2 25
$4.2M
Q1 25
$16.7M
Q4 24
$3.3M
Q3 24
$8.5M
Q2 24
$1.6M
Q1 24
$10.1M
FCF Margin
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
8.2%
Q3 25
7.4%
Q2 25
3.7%
Q1 25
15.3%
Q4 24
3.0%
Q3 24
8.3%
Q2 24
1.6%
Q1 24
10.4%
Capex Intensity
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
0.9%
Q3 25
0.7%
Q2 25
0.8%
Q1 25
1.2%
Q4 24
0.8%
Q3 24
0.5%
Q2 24
0.5%
Q1 24
1.1%
Cash Conversion
SPT
SPT
TPL
TPL
Q4 25
0.92×
Q3 25
1.28×
Q2 25
1.04×
Q1 25
1.30×
Q4 24
1.07×
Q3 24
1.11×
Q2 24
0.86×
Q1 24
1.29×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

SPT
SPT

Segment breakdown not available.

TPL
TPL

Water Serviceand Operations Segment$98.2M46%
Water Sales And Royalties$60.7M29%
Produced Water Royalties$33.5M16%
Easementand Sundry$20.6M10%

Related Comparisons