vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SouthState Bank Corp (SSB) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SouthState Bank Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($661.7M vs $508.3M, roughly 1.3× TIC Solutions, Inc.). SouthState Bank Corp runs the higher net margin — 34.1% vs -9.3%, a 43.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
SouthState Bank, based in Winter Haven, Florida, is an American bank and a subsidiary of SouthState Corporation, a bank holding company. As of May 26, 2025, the company had 371 branches in South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Virginia, Colorado and Texas.
SSB vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $661.7M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $225.8M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | 34.1% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 153.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.28 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $661.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $581.1M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $599.7M | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $577.9M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $544.5M | $234.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $369.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $351.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $350.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | $225.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $247.7M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $246.6M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.2M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $89.1M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $143.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 54.3% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.6% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.3% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.6% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.1% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.28 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.47 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.42 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.11 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.87 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.88 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.86 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.73 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9B | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.0B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $68.0B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $155.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $752.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $9.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | $68.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.2B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $232.1M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.4M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.6M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-126.3M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $354.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-246.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $215.5M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.7M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.5M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-139.1M | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-254.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $117.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.1% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 92.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -72.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.42× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.96× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SSB
| Net Interest Income | $561.6M | 85% |
| Noninterest Income | $100.1M | 15% |
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
