vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc (SSNC) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.5× SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 13.7%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 8.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 6.5%).
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational holding company headquartered in Windsor, Connecticut, that sells software and software as a service to the financial services industry. The company has offices in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
SSNC vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $226.1M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 48.7% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 24.2% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 13.7% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.8% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.2% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.91 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $226.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.1M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.8M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $213.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $248.2M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.4M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $190.3M | $159.3M |
| Q1 26 | 48.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.8% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.7% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.0% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.3% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.3% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.0% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 74.9% |
| Q1 26 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.3% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.4% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.6% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.6% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.8% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.1% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.91 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.76 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.84 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.98 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.65 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $420.9M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.4B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $20.3B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.08× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $420.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $462.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $388.3M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $480.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $515.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $694.7M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $462.7M | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.9B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $20.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.5B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9B | $13.4B |
| Q1 26 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $299.7M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.33× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $299.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $643.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $456.2M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $372.9M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $272.2M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $486.6M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $336.6M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $384.9M | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $633.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $421.5M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $350.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $259.5M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $466.9M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $310.7M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.9M | $209.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.3% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.5% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.33× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.17× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.28× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.96× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.02× | 1.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SSNC
| Technology-enabled services | $1.4B | 85% |
| License, maintenance and related | $239.8M | 15% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
