vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.8M vs $137.0M, roughly 1.6× STRATASYS LTD.). UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs -40.6%, a 46.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs -2.2%). STRATASYS LTD. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.5M vs $-19.2M). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
SSYS vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $137.0M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $-55.6M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 41.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -16.6% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | -40.6% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.2% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -109.0% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.0M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.1M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.0M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.0M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.1M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-55.6M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.7M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.6M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.0M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.0% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -40.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.0% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $71.5M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $852.5M | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.5M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.1M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.1M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.9M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $91.1M | $116.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $141.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $852.5M | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $902.4M | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $784.8M | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $831.8M | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $850.5M | $239.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $866.1M | $232.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $706.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $702.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.9M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.5M | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.8% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.5M | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.4M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $789.0K | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.3M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SSYS
Segment breakdown not available.
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
