vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST) and SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sensata Technologies Holding plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($934.8M vs $480.2M, roughly 1.9× SunCoke Energy, Inc.). Sensata Technologies Holding plc runs the higher net margin — 9.3% vs -17.8%, a 27.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sensata Technologies Holding plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -1.2%). Sensata Technologies Holding plc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($104.6M vs $32.8M). Over the past eight quarters, SunCoke Energy, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.8% CAGR vs -5.0%).
Sensata Technologies Holding plc is a global industrial technology company that designs, manufactures and sells a broad portfolio of sensing, electrical protection and control solutions. Its products serve automotive, industrial, aerospace, HVAC, telecommunications and heavy vehicle end markets, catering to manufacturing and enterprise clients across the world.
Energy Brands, also doing business as Glacéau, is a privately owned subsidiary of the Coca-Cola Company based in Whitestone, Queens, New York, that manufactures and distributes various lines of drinks marketed as enhanced water. Founded in May 1996 by J. Darius Bikoff with an electrolyte enhanced line of water called Smartwater, Energy Brands initially distributed its products to health food stores and independent retailers in the New York area. Adding Fruitwater and Vitaminwater to its line ...
ST vs SXC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $934.8M | $480.2M |
| Net Profit | $87.1M | $-85.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | -20.4% |
| Net Margin | 9.3% | -17.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | -1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.6% | -461.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.59 | $-1.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $934.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $917.9M | $480.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $932.0M | $487.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $943.4M | $434.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $911.3M | $436.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $907.7M | $486.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $982.8M | $490.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $470.9M |
| Q1 26 | $87.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.2M | $-85.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-162.5M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.7M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.9M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8M | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.0M | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.7M | $21.5M |
| Q1 26 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | -20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 7.4% |
| Q1 26 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | -17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.59 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.45 | $-1.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.12 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.41 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $0.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.47 | $0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $635.1M | $88.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $685.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9B | $597.3M |
| Total Assets | $6.8B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $635.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $573.0M | $88.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $791.3M | $80.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $661.8M | $186.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $588.1M | $193.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $593.7M | $189.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.2M | $164.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $81.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $685.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $691.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $493.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $492.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $491.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $491.3M |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $597.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $695.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $677.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $684.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $680.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $658.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $636.9M |
| Q1 26 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.02× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | 0.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $122.5M | $56.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $104.6M | $32.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.2% | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $508.3M | $42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $122.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $201.5M | $56.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.9M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.2M | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $170.7M | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.9M | $107.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.5M | $-9.3M |
| Q1 26 | $104.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.9M | $32.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.2M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.5M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.6M | $20.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.9M | $36.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.3M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.4M | $-26.8M |
| Q1 26 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | -5.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.32× | 9.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.70× | 1.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.50× | 2.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.00× | -0.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
