vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of IMPACT BIOMEDICAL INC. (IBO) and Solidion Technology Inc. (STI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMPACT BIOMEDICAL INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.0K vs $9.3K, roughly 1.9× Solidion Technology Inc.). IMPACT BIOMEDICAL INC. runs the higher net margin — -8166.7% vs -43766.3%, a 35599.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
IMPACT BIOMEDICAL INC.IBOEarnings & Financial Report
The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB), founded at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2000, is located in Bethesda, Maryland. It is one of 27 institutes and centers that are part of NIH, an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Micron Technology, Inc. is an American producer of computer memory and computer data storage including dynamic random-access memory, flash memory, and solid-state drives (SSDs). It is headquartered in Boise, Idaho.
IBO vs STI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.0K | $9.3K |
| Net Profit | $-1.5M | $-4.1M |
| Gross Margin | 94.4% | 53.8% |
| Operating Margin | -5266.7% | -18640.6% |
| Net Margin | -8166.7% | -43766.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -134.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $-1.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $18.0K | $9.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0K | $4.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $5.3K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.3K | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $300 |
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.3M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q3 25 | 94.4% | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.1% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 100.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 100.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | 100.0% |
| Q3 25 | -5266.7% | -18640.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -16471.4% | -44678.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -20816.3% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -109398.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -580605.7% |
| Q3 25 | -8166.7% | -43766.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -204942.9% | -52846.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -20885.8% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -109315.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -580514.0% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.12 | $-1.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.18 | $-0.70 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $12.0K | $160.5K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-11.8M | $-17.4M |
| Total Assets | $18.2M | $5.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $12.0K | $160.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $624.0K | $114.7K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $-11.8M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.3M | $-14.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $4.7M |
| Q3 25 | $18.2M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.1M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $130.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-613.0K | $-351.8K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-613.0K | $-351.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-694.0K | $-913.7K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-769.4K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-777.0K | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-1.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
