vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ) and USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC (USNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($320.9M vs $250.2M, roughly 1.3× USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC). USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC runs the higher net margin — 3.0% vs -16.4%, a 19.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.0% vs -7.5%). Over the past eight quarters, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs -40.6%).
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
Usana Health Sciences, Inc., or USANA, is an American multi-level marketing company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of 2021, Usana was the 14th largest direct-selling company in the world by revenue. The company manufactures most of its nutritional products, dietary supplements, and skincare products at a Salt Lake City facility. Its products are sold in 24 countries via a network of independent distributors.
STRZ vs USNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $320.9M | $250.2M |
| Net Profit | $-52.6M | $7.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | -10.8% | 5.5% |
| Net Margin | -16.4% | 3.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.5% | -3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -71.9% | -20.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.15 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $250.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $226.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $320.9M | $213.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.7M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $249.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $970.5M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.9M | $200.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $347.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $180.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-52.6M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.5M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.6M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 76.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.4% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.4% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.15 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.54 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.83 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.0M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $608.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $663.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $739.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.92× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | $145.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.6M | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $179.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.5M | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | $364.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $192.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $608.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $611.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $663.2M | $528.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $712.3M | $531.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $529.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-168.3M | $532.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $935.9M | $533.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $973.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $739.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $742.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $726.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $734.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $746.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $671.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-26.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-31.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -9.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-317.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.4M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-335.3M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-31.3M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.5M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-349.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-38.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.8% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.98× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |
USNA
Segment breakdown not available.
