vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ) and VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. (VRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($320.9M vs $199.5M, roughly 1.6× VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.). VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 3.6% vs -16.4%, a 19.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.1% vs -7.5%). Over the past eight quarters, VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-5.7% CAGR vs -40.6%).
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.VRTSEarnings & Financial Report
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is an American company which operates as a multi-manager asset management business, comprising a number of individual affiliated managers, each having its own investment process and brand, and the services of unaffiliated sub advisers.
STRZ vs VRTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $320.9M | $199.5M |
| Net Profit | $-52.6M | $7.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.8% | 7.7% |
| Net Margin | -16.4% | 3.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.5% | -4.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -71.9% | -78.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.15 | $1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $320.9M | $216.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.7M | $210.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $970.5M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.9M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $347.6M | $224.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-52.6M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.5M | $42.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.9M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.6M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.4% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.3% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.8% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 11.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.15 | $4.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.54 | $6.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $4.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.83 | $5.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | $2.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.0M | $136.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $608.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $663.2M | $93.6B |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.92× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $136.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $192.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $608.7M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $611.7M | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $237.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $247.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $93.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $934.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $663.2M | $918.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $712.3M | $896.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $893.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-168.3M | $897.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $935.9M | $889.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $973.1M | $868.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.92× | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-26.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-31.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -9.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-317.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-67.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.1M | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.4M | $75.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-335.3M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.5M | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-74.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-31.3M | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.5M | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-349.3M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4M | $68.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-38.4M | $68.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.8% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.3% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.0% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.98× | 2.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |
VRTS
| Investment management fees | $169.1M | 85% |
| Administration and shareholder service fees | $17.3M | 9% |
| Distribution and service fees | $11.6M | 6% |
