vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.1M vs $320.9M, roughly 1.9× STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs -16.4%, a 29.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs -7.5%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $-31.3M). Over the past eight quarters, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -40.6%).
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
STRZ vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $320.9M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $-52.6M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | -10.8% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | -16.4% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.5% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -71.9% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.15 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $320.9M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.7M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $970.5M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.9M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $347.6M | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-52.6M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.5M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.9M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.6M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.8% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.4% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.3% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.15 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.54 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.83 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.0M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $608.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $663.2M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.92× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.6M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.5M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $192.5M | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $608.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $611.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $663.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $712.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-168.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $935.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $973.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-26.1M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-31.3M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -9.8% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-317.7M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.1M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.4M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-335.3M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.5M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-31.3M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.5M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-349.3M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-38.4M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.8% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.0% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.98× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |
WTS
Segment breakdown not available.
