vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of State Street Corporation (STT) and Trane Technologies (TT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Trane Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.0B vs $3.7B, roughly 1.4× State Street Corporation). State Street Corporation runs the higher net margin — 20.4% vs 11.9%, a 8.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, State Street Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.5% vs 6.0%). State Street Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.8B vs $573.0M). Over the past eight quarters, State Street Corporation's revenue compounded faster (8.1% CAGR vs -3.2%).
State Street Corporation is an American multinational financial services and bank holding company headquartered at One Congress Street in Boston. It is the second-oldest continuously operating U.S. bank, tracing its roots to Union Bank, chartered in 1792. As of the third quarter of 2025, State Street is one of the world's largest asset managers and custodians, with approximately US$5.4 trillion in assets under management and US$51.7 trillion under custody and administration.
Trane Technologies plc is an Irish domiciled company focused on heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration systems. The company traces its corporate history back more than 150 years and was created after a series of mergers and spin-offs. In 2008, HVAC manufacturer Trane was acquired by Ingersoll Rand, a US industrial tools manufacturer. In 2020, the tools business was spun off as Ingersoll Rand and the remaining company was renamed Trane Technologies.
STT vs TT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.7B | $5.0B |
| Net Profit | $747.0M | $589.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 165.2% |
| Operating Margin | 25.0% | 15.6% |
| Net Margin | 20.4% | 11.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.5% | 6.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.6% | -3.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.41 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $589.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $747.0M | $591.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $861.0M | $847.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $693.0M | $874.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $644.0M | $604.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $783.0M | $604.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $730.0M | $772.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $711.0M | $755.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 165.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.0% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.1% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.6% | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.1% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.3% | 14.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.41 | $2.64 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.78 | $3.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.17 | $3.89 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.04 | $2.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.43 | $2.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.26 | $3.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.15 | $3.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $27.8B | $8.6B |
| Total Assets | $366.0B | $22.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.8B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.6B | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.3B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.7B | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.3B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.8B | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8B | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $366.0B | $21.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.1B | $21.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $376.7B | $21.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $372.7B | $20.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $353.2B | $20.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $338.5B | $20.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $325.6B | $20.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $10.0B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.8B | $573.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 266.6% | 11.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.3% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 13.44× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $10.8B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4B | $692.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $339.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.4B | $899.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.6B | $695.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $573.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $935.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.8B | $602.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $220.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.7B | $774.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.9B | $623.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 266.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 216.0% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -254.1% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -225.1% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.9% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -246.2% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.44× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.18× | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.18× | 0.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.72× | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.49× | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.71× | 1.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.75× | 0.92× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STT
| Other | $2.2B | 59% |
| Investment Management | $729.0M | 20% |
| Management Services | $662.0M | 18% |
| Other Fee Revenue | $56.0M | 2% |
| Securities Financing Services | $54.0M | 1% |
TT
| Americas | $4.0B | 80% |
| EMEA | $639.5M | 13% |
| Asia Pacific | $331.5M | 7% |
