vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Stereotaxis, Inc. (STXS) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.5M vs $8.6M, roughly 1.3× Stereotaxis, Inc.). On growth, Stereotaxis, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (36.3% vs 11.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Stereotaxis, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs 3.5%).
Stereotaxis Inc. is an American publicly traded medical technology company based in St. Louis, Missouri, that makes robotic systems used by physicians to perform minimally-invasive endovascular procedures, including electrophysiology studies and cardiac catheter ablation procedures.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
STXS vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.6M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $-5.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | 50.1% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | -65.4% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | -64.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 36.3% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.3M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.5M | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.8M | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.8M | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.5M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 50.1% | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.9% | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.0% | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.4% | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.7% | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.6% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.6% | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.6% | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | -65.4% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -87.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -45.2% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.3% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -120.3% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -69.0% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -133.7% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -69.0% | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | -64.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -86.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.5% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -77.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -118.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -67.3% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -129.6% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -65.5% | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.4M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.5M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $52.3M | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.4M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.2M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $13.5M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.8M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.4M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | $52.3M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.2M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.7M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.9M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.0M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.5M | $51.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.0M | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.0M | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.2M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.3M | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.1M | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.3M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.3M | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -47.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STXS
| Disposables Service And Accessories | $5.3M | 61% |
| Systems | $3.4M | 39% |
TACT
Segment breakdown not available.
