vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Service Properties Trust (SVC) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Service Properties Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($296.5M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.2× Tecnoglass Inc.). Tecnoglass Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs -0.3%, a 10.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tecnoglass Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.4% vs -17.0%). Tecnoglass Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.4M vs $-95.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs -6.1%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
SVC vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $296.5M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $-782.0K | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | -0.3% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -17.0% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 99.0% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $296.5M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $377.6M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.4M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.0M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.0M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.9M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.5M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.2M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-782.0K | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-46.9M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-38.2M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-116.4M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-76.4M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-46.9M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-73.8M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-78.4M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | -3.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.8% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.1% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.4% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | -0.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.4% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.8% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.9% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.3% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.28 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.23 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.70 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.46 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.28 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.45 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.48 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $346.8M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.5B | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $646.1M | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 8.52× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $417.4M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.1M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.6M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.3M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | $646.1M | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $647.9M | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $695.9M | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $734.6M | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $851.9M | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $929.0M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.2B | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | 8.52× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.85× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.5M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-95.2M | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -32.1% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.9% | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-107.0M | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-18.5M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.1M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.0K | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.2M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.7M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.2M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-926.0K | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-95.2M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.9M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-46.6M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.2M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-88.9M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.1M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.3M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-77.2M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | -32.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.9% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.9% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.0% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 25.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.7% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SVC
Segment breakdown not available.
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
