vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SILVERCORP METALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($223.8M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.1× T1 Energy Inc.). SILVERCORP METALS INC runs the higher net margin — -1.3% vs -62.0%, a 60.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
SVM vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $223.8M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $-2.9M | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | -1.3% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $223.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.2M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.0M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-28.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.0% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | — | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $219.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $249.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $603.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $602.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $201.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $561.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $582.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $644.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $670.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.0M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-44.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-16.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.8M | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-37.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -138.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 54.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SVM
Segment breakdown not available.
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
