vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM) and UL Solutions Inc. (ULS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

UL Solutions Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($340.0M vs $223.8M, roughly 1.5× SILVERCORP METALS INC). Over the past eight quarters, SILVERCORP METALS INC's revenue compounded faster (87.6% CAGR vs -31.8%).

Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.

The UL enterprise is a global private safety company headquartered in Northbrook, Illinois, composed of three organizations, UL Research Institutes, UL Standards & Engagement and UL Solutions.

SVM vs ULS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ULS
ULS
1.5× larger
ULS
$340.0M
$223.8M
SVM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
SVM
SVM
Annualised
SVM
87.6%
-31.8%
ULS

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
SVM
SVM
ULS
ULS
Revenue
$223.8M
$340.0M
Net Profit
$-2.9M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
24.4%
Net Margin
-1.3%
Revenue YoY
-12.4%
Net Profit YoY
EPS (diluted)

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
SVM
SVM
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
$340.0M
Q4 25
$223.8M
$789.0M
Q3 25
$783.0M
Q2 25
$72.2M
$776.0M
Q1 25
$705.0M
Q4 24
$172.5M
$739.0M
Q3 24
$114.0M
$731.0M
Q2 24
$60.0M
$730.0M
Net Profit
SVM
SVM
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-2.9M
$67.0M
Q3 25
$100.0M
Q2 25
$28.1M
$91.0M
Q1 25
$67.0M
Q4 24
$42.1M
$81.0M
Q3 24
$28.0M
$88.0M
Q2 24
$13.2M
$101.0M
Gross Margin
SVM
SVM
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
49.7%
Q3 25
50.3%
Q2 25
49.4%
Q1 25
48.4%
Q4 24
47.4%
Q3 24
49.0%
Q2 24
50.1%
Operating Margin
SVM
SVM
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
24.4%
Q4 25
15.0%
Q3 25
19.9%
Q2 25
17.9%
Q1 25
15.5%
Q4 24
30.5%
15.6%
Q3 24
30.7%
17.8%
Q2 24
30.0%
17.3%
Net Margin
SVM
SVM
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
-1.3%
8.5%
Q3 25
12.8%
Q2 25
39.0%
11.7%
Q1 25
9.5%
Q4 24
24.4%
11.0%
Q3 24
24.5%
12.0%
Q2 24
22.0%
13.8%
EPS (diluted)
SVM
SVM
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.33
Q3 25
$0.49
Q2 25
$0.45
Q1 25
$0.33
Q4 24
$0.40
Q3 24
$0.44
Q2 24
$0.50

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
SVM
SVM
ULS
ULS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$107.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
SVM
SVM
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$107.9M
$144.0M
Q3 25
$155.0M
Q2 25
$40.0M
$147.0M
Q1 25
$154.0M
Q4 24
$81.3M
$130.0M
Q3 24
$57.7M
$150.0M
Q2 24
$28.9M
$103.0M
Free Cash Flow
SVM
SVM
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$86.0M
Q3 25
$109.0M
Q2 25
$105.0M
Q1 25
$103.0M
Q4 24
$72.0M
Q3 24
$33.8M
$84.0M
Q2 24
$17.0M
$47.0M
FCF Margin
SVM
SVM
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
10.9%
Q3 25
13.9%
Q2 25
13.5%
Q1 25
14.6%
Q4 24
9.7%
Q3 24
29.6%
11.5%
Q2 24
28.3%
6.4%
Capex Intensity
SVM
SVM
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
7.4%
Q3 25
5.9%
Q2 25
5.4%
Q1 25
7.2%
Q4 24
7.8%
Q3 24
21.0%
9.0%
Q2 24
19.8%
7.7%
Cash Conversion
SVM
SVM
ULS
ULS
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.15×
Q3 25
1.55×
Q2 25
1.42×
1.62×
Q1 25
2.30×
Q4 24
1.93×
1.60×
Q3 24
2.06×
1.70×
Q2 24
2.19×
1.02×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons