vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM) and UL Solutions Inc. (ULS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UL Solutions Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($340.0M vs $223.8M, roughly 1.5× SILVERCORP METALS INC). Over the past eight quarters, SILVERCORP METALS INC's revenue compounded faster (87.6% CAGR vs -31.8%).
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.
The UL enterprise is a global private safety company headquartered in Northbrook, Illinois, composed of three organizations, UL Research Institutes, UL Standards & Engagement and UL Solutions.
SVM vs ULS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $223.8M | $340.0M |
| Net Profit | $-2.9M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.4% |
| Net Margin | -1.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | -12.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $340.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $223.8M | $789.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $783.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.2M | $776.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $705.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.5M | $739.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.0M | $731.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $730.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $67.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $81.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $101.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 49.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.5% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.0% | 17.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.0% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.4% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | 13.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.50 |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $155.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.0M | $147.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $154.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.3M | $130.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $150.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $103.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $86.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $109.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $105.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.8M | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | $47.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.3% | 6.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 1.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | 1.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.