vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Savers Value Village, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($426.9M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.7× Tecnoglass Inc.). Tecnoglass Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs -3.3%, a 13.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Savers Value Village, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 2.4%). Tecnoglass Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.4M vs $-6.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 4.3%).
Value Village Stores, Inc. was a Midwestern United States chain of retail stores aimed at the discount department-store market. Henry Horney, formerly of F.W. Woolworth Company founded a small, regional chain of discount stores located in the two states of Wisconsin and Illinois that opened in 1961 and operated into 1989. Horney also had a real estate company and often built small shopping malls adjoining the discount stores. The chain had no relation to the Savers Value Village chain of thri...
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
SVV vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $426.9M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $-14.0M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | -3.3% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -164.6% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $426.9M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $417.2M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.1M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $402.0M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.8M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $386.7M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $354.2M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.0M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.9M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.7M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-467.0K | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.6% | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.2% | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.3% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.1% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.02 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.5M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $750.0M | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $414.6M | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.81× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.5M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.5M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.0M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.0M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.7M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.7M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.2M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $750.0M | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $414.6M | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $423.5M | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $413.8M | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $421.7M | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $432.9M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $419.5M | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $395.0M | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.81× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $21.6M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.3M | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.5% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.5% | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.5M | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.6M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.4M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $419.0K | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.8M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.9M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.8M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.3M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.9M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.2M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.1M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.6M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-28.3M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.0% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.88× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.10× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.22× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SVV
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $408.3M | 96% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $18.6M | 4% |
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |