vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) and Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Latham Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($100.0M vs $57.7M, roughly 1.7× Third Coast Bancshares, Inc.). Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.4% vs -7.0%, a 35.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Third Coast Bancshares, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.5% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. is a regional financial holding company headquartered in the U.S. Gulf Coast region. It provides a full suite of commercial and retail banking services including deposit products, business and consumer loans, mortgage services, and wealth management solutions, serving local small and medium-sized enterprises, individual consumers, and community clients across Texas and surrounding areas.
SWIM vs TCBX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $100.0M | $57.7M |
| Net Profit | $-7.0M | $16.4M |
| Gross Margin | 28.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -7.0% | 28.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.0% | 20.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.88 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $57.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $100.0M | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.9M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.6M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.4M | $45.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $87.3M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.5M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.1M | $41.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.0M | $17.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | $18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.0M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.0M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-29.2M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3M | $10.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.7% | 38.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 40.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.4% | 37.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.9% | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.0% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | 33.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 29.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.4% | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 25.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.88 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $1.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $0.96 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.24 | $0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $279.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $405.9M | $650.5M |
| Total Assets | $823.2M | $6.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.69× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $175.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $113.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $219.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $371.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $258.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $241.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $279.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $281.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $281.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $650.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $405.9M | $531.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.4M | $513.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $398.4M | $496.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $381.1M | $479.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.2M | $460.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $416.6M | $450.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $408.1M | $435.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $823.2M | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $844.4M | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $822.1M | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $824.6M | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $794.2M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $853.4M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $830.0M | $4.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.69× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $23.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $38.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | $50.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.0M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.9M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2M | $35.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.2M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.4M | $7.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.0K | $33.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 72.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.29× | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.25× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.32× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.95× | 0.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
TCBX
| Net Interest Income | $53.6M | 93% |
| Noninterest Income | $4.0M | 7% |
