vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) and United Homes Group, Inc. (UHG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
United Homes Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($123.4M vs $100.0M, roughly 1.2× Latham Group, Inc.). United Homes Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 2.6% vs -7.0%, a 9.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Latham Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.5% vs -8.5%). Latham Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.1M vs $616.0K). Over the past eight quarters, United Homes Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.6% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
Invitation Homes Inc. is a public company traded on the New York Stock Exchange. It is headquartered in the Lincoln Center building in Dallas, Texas. Dallas B. Tanner is chief executive officer. As of 2017, the company was reportedly the largest owner of single-family rental homes in the United States. As of July 2024, the company owned about 84,000 rental homes in 16 markets. Seventeen percent of their rental income is from California.
SWIM vs UHG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $100.0M | $123.4M |
| Net Profit | $-7.0M | $3.2M |
| Gross Margin | 28.0% | 17.5% |
| Operating Margin | -10.7% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | -7.0% | 2.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.5% | -8.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.0% | 380.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $100.0M | $123.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.9M | $90.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.6M | $105.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.4M | $87.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $87.3M | $134.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.5M | $118.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.1M | $109.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.6M | $100.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | $-31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.0M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.0M | $18.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-29.2M | $667.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3M | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.9M | $24.9M |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.4% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.1% | 18.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.5% | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.1% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.7% | 16.0% |
| Q4 25 | -10.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.4% | -2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | -0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | -1.0% |
| Q4 25 | -7.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | -34.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.1% | 24.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.24 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $24.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $279.8M | $67.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $405.9M | $57.4M |
| Total Assets | $823.2M | $276.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.69× | 1.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $36.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $28.7M |
| Q4 25 | $279.8M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $281.1M | $67.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $281.5M | $67.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.9M | $67.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.5M | $67.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $282.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $405.9M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.4M | $52.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $398.4M | $82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $381.1M | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.2M | $66.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $416.6M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $408.1M | $25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $391.8M | $-4.7M |
| Q4 25 | $823.2M | $276.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $844.4M | $293.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $822.1M | $281.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $824.6M | $266.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $794.2M | $265.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $853.4M | $282.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $830.0M | $284.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $808.6M | $287.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.69× | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | 0.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.81× | 0.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.73× | 1.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.72× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $23.3M | $1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.1M | $616.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.1% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.2% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $38.0M | $-21.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.0M | $-23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.9M | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2M | $27.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.2M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.4M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.5M | $-17.9M |
| Q4 25 | $14.1M | $616.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.2M | $-24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.0K | $27.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-39.9M | $-17.9M |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.9% | -27.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.0% | -17.8% |
| Q4 25 | 9.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.29× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.25× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.95× | -0.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.72× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
UHG
| GSH South Carolina | $116.3M | 94% |
| Rosewood | $5.9M | 5% |
| Other Segment | $1.1M | 1% |
