vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) and XBP Global Holdings, Inc. (XBP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
XBP Global Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($152.4M vs $100.0M, roughly 1.5× Latham Group, Inc.). Latham Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.0% vs -200.7%, a 193.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Latham Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.5% vs -34.7%). Latham Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.1M vs $10.5M).
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
SWIM vs XBP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $100.0M | $152.4M |
| Net Profit | $-7.0M | $-305.8M |
| Gross Margin | 28.0% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | -10.7% | -191.7% |
| Net Margin | -7.0% | -200.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.5% | -34.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.0% | -980.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-2.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $100.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $161.9M | $152.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $87.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.5M | $233.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1M | $-305.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-29.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $-28.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | -191.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.0% | -200.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | -12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $-2.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.24 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $34.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $279.8M | $381.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $405.9M | $130.5M |
| Total Assets | $823.2M | $947.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.69× | 2.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $279.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $281.1M | $381.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $281.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.8M | $31.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $282.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $282.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $405.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.4M | $130.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $398.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $381.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $416.6M | $-1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $408.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $391.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $823.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $844.4M | $947.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $822.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $824.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $794.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $853.4M | $99.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $830.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $808.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.69× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.72× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $23.3M | $13.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.1M | $10.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.1% | 6.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.2% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $38.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.0M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.2M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.2M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-50.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-39.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.29× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.25× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.95× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
XBP
| Related And Non Related Party | $136.5M | 90% |
| Technology | $8.2M | 5% |
| Other | $5.7M | 4% |
| Deferred Revenue As Of July312025 | $1.9M | 1% |