vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD (TANH) and Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Westlake Chemical Partners LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($323.0M vs $21.5M, roughly 15.0× TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD). TANTECH HOLDINGS LTD runs the higher net margin — 8.2% vs 4.5%, a 3.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Westlake Chemical Partners LP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.4% vs -0.2%).
Tantech Holdings Ltd is a China-based specialty manufacturing enterprise focused on R&D, production and distribution of bamboo-derived carbon products, high-performance clean energy materials and eco-friendly consumer goods, serving customers across Chinese and global markets in consumer goods, industrial materials and new energy segments.
Westlake Chemical Partners LP is a petrochemical limited partnership that manufactures and markets basic products including ethylene, polyethylene, and styrene monomers. It operates mainly in North America, serving packaging, construction, consumer goods, and industrial manufacturing sectors.
TANH vs WLKP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.5M | $323.0M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $14.5M |
| Gross Margin | 22.2% | 30.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.8% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 8.2% | 4.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.2% | 11.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 59.8% | -3.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $323.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $308.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.5M | $297.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $290.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $277.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | $284.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $284.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.3% | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 32.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $35.2M | $44.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $128.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $143.0M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $44.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.2M | $36.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $58.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $60.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.2M | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $128.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $120.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $111.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 34.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 8.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $201.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $120.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $105.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $132.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $126.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $121.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $104.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $111.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $75.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $110.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $111.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $94.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | 39.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.01× | 8.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TANH
| Revenue from China | $20.9M | 97% |
| Revenue directly from foreign countries | $602.2K | 3% |
WLKP
| Affiliated Entity | $296.9M | 92% |
| Nonrelated Party | $26.2M | 8% |
