vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.4M vs $304.6M, roughly 1.1× Trip.com Group Ltd). Trip.com Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — 27.8% vs 7.0%, a 20.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Trip.com Group Limited is a multinational travel agency headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest online travel service provider in the world.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
TCOM vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $304.6M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $84.6M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | 78.8% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 27.8% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.12 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $304.6M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.7M | $346.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $289.7M |
| Q4 25 | $84.6M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $22.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | 78.8% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.8% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.1% |
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.12 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.8B | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.2B | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.8B | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $36.9B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.8B | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.4B | $94.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $89.8M |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2B | $387.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $23.8B | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1B | $451.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $428.5M |
| Q4 25 | $36.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.45× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TCOM
| Others | $273.0M | 90% |
| Other | $31.6M | 10% |
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
