vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM) and Ucommune International Ltd (UK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Trip.com Group Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($304.6M vs $1.3M, roughly 243.4× Ucommune International Ltd). Trip.com Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — 27.8% vs -14.0%, a 41.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Trip.com Group Limited is a multinational travel agency headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest online travel service provider in the world.
Ucommune International Ltd., formerly known as UrWork, is a Beijing-based co-working space provider founded in 2015 by Mao Daqing. It is now the second-largest co-working space provider after WeWork, with properties in three dozen cities around the world, including Shanghai, Singapore, Hong Kong and New York City. The company was valued at 1.8 billion US dollars in August 2018, making it the first domestic unicorn in the Chinese co-working space, but by November 2018, Ucommune had completed i...
TCOM vs UK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $304.6M | $1.3M |
| Net Profit | $84.6M | $-175.0K |
| Gross Margin | 78.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | -18.8% |
| Net Margin | 27.8% | -14.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -92.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 97.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.12 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $304.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.7M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $214.5M | $37.2M | ||
| Q4 22 | $100.7M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $82.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $44.4M |
| Q4 25 | $84.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-175.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | $12.6M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 22 | $41.5M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $152.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-34.2M |
| Q4 25 | 78.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 82.0% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 76.0% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 75.5% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | -23.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | 26.4% | -22.0% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -86.7% |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.4% | -42.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | 5.9% | -14.2% | ||
| Q4 22 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 184.6% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -77.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $-8.55 | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.02 | $-0.99 | ||
| Q4 22 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-7.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.8B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.8B | $1.2M |
| Total Assets | $36.9B | $1.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.4B | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.6B | $8.6M | ||
| Q4 22 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $15.9M |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $7.2B | $50.9K | ||
| Q4 22 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | $23.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1B | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $16.3B | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 22 | $16.3B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $15.2B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | $36.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.2B | $68.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $30.1B | $103.4M | ||
| Q4 22 | $27.8B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $26.9B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $200.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.44× | 0.02× | ||
| Q4 22 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
