vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TECK RESOURCES LTD (TECK) and Vale S.A. (VALE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vale S.A. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.8B vs $6.3B, roughly 1.4× TECK RESOURCES LTD).
Teck Resources Limited is a diversified natural resources company headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, that is engaged in mining and mineral development, including coal for the steelmaking industry, copper, zinc, and energy. Secondary products include lead, silver, gold, molybdenum, germanium, indium and cadmium. Teck Resources was formed from the amalgamation of Teck and Cominco in 2001.
Vale, formerly Companhia Vale do Rio Doce, is a Brazilian multinational corporation engaged in metals and mining and one of the largest logistics operators in Brazil. Vale is the largest producer of iron ore and nickel in the world. It also produces manganese, ferroalloys, copper, bauxite, potash, kaolin, and cobalt; as of 2014 the company operated nine hydroelectricity plants, and a large network of railroads, ships, and ports used to transport its products.
TECK vs VALE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.3B | $8.8B |
| Net Profit | — | $2.1B |
| Gross Margin | 17.0% | 30.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | 22.8% |
| Net Margin | — | 24.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -22.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $8.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $11.2B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $928.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $6.2B |
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 30.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.1% | 36.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 46.7% |
| Q3 25 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.8% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.8% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 38.5% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 55.6% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $40.5B |
| Total Assets | — | $90.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $7.2B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $40.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $40.3B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $37.0B |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $90.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $86.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $91.5B | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
