vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TECK RESOURCES LTD (TECK) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TECK RESOURCES LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.3B vs $3.7B, roughly 1.7× W. R. Berkley Corporation).
Teck Resources Limited is a diversified natural resources company headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, that is engaged in mining and mineral development, including coal for the steelmaking industry, copper, zinc, and energy. Secondary products include lead, silver, gold, molybdenum, germanium, indium and cadmium. Teck Resources was formed from the amalgamation of Teck and Cominco in 2001.
William Robert Berkley is the founder and current chairman of W. R. Berkley Corporation and the chairman of the New York University Board of Trustees.
TECK vs WRB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.3B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | — | $515.2M |
| Gross Margin | 17.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 14.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $515.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $449.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $511.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $401.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $417.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $576.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $365.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $371.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.0% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.8% | 14.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | — | $44.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $44.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $44.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $43.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $42.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.9B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
