vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Tempus AI, Inc. (TEM) and Gentherm Inc (THRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gentherm Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($382.8M vs $367.2M, roughly 1.0× Tempus AI, Inc.). Gentherm Inc runs the higher net margin — 0.8% vs -14.8%, a 15.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tempus AI, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (83.0% vs 8.5%). Gentherm Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($6.7M vs $-41.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Tempus AI, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (58.7% CAGR vs 3.7%).
Tempus AI, Inc. is an American health technology company founded in 2015 by Eric Lefkofsky in Chicago, Illinois. It was established by Lefkofsky soon after his wife was diagnosed with breast cancer. Tempus uses data and artificial intelligence (AI) to create precision medicine services, including diagnostics, for oncology, cardiology, radiology, and depression. The company went public on the Nasdaq on June 14, 2024, under the ticker symbol "TEM."
Gentherm Incorporated, formerly Amerigon, is an American thermal management technologies company. Gentherm created the first thermoelectrically heated and cooled seat system for the automotive industry. Called the "Climate Control Seat" system, it was first adopted by the Ford Motor Company and introduced as an option on the model year 2000 Lincoln Navigator in 1999. Today it is available on more than 50 vehicles sold by Ford, General Motors, Toyota (Lexus), Kia, Hyundai, Nissan (Infiniti), R...
TEM vs THRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $367.2M | $382.8M |
| Net Profit | $-54.2M | $3.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.7% |
| Operating Margin | -16.7% | 4.6% |
| Net Margin | -14.8% | 0.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 83.0% | 8.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -316.2% | -80.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $367.2M | $382.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.2M | $386.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $314.6M | $375.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $255.7M | $353.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.7M | $352.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.9M | $371.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $166.0M | $375.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.8M | $356.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-54.2M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-80.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.8M | $477.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-68.0M | $-128.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-75.8M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-552.2M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-64.7M | $14.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.9% |
| Q4 25 | -16.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -321.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.5% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | -14.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.6% | -0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -41.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -332.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -44.4% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.30 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.46 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.40 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.56 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.46 | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.86 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.47 | $0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $604.8M | $160.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $189.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $491.3M | $720.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.26× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $604.8M | $160.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $655.9M | $154.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.3M | $128.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $151.6M | $163.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.0M | $134.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.0M | $150.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $478.8M | $123.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.9M | $125.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $189.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $189.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $209.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $262.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $220.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $222.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $222.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $222.2M |
| Q4 25 | $491.3M | $720.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $507.8M | $717.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $309.6M | $699.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $326.2M | $646.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.3M | $616.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.7M | $660.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.3M | $640.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5B | $647.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $926.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $971.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $864.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-36.8M | $29.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-41.5M | $6.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.3% | 1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 5.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-239.1M | $61.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-36.8M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-119.8M | $56.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.2M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-105.6M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $36.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.7M | $46.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-97.1M | $37.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-101.4M | $-10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-41.5M | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-126.5M | $46.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6M | $36.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-107.7M | $-28.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.6M | $26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-105.1M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-107.5M | $-21.6M |
| Q4 25 | -11.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.1% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -63.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -73.7% | -6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.2% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 94.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TEM
Segment breakdown not available.
THRM
| Climate Control Seats | $200.9M | 52% |
| Lumbar And Massage Comfort Solutions | $58.5M | 15% |
| Climate Control Interiors | $50.3M | 13% |
| Other Automotive | $27.6M | 7% |
| Valve Systems | $24.1M | 6% |
| Medical Segments | $13.9M | 4% |
| Climate And Comfort Electronics | $7.4M | 2% |
