vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Tempus AI, Inc. (TEM) and VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. (VRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Tempus AI, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($367.2M vs $199.5M, roughly 1.8× VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.). VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 3.6% vs -14.8%, a 18.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tempus AI, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (83.0% vs -4.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Tempus AI, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (58.7% CAGR vs -5.7%).

Tempus AI, Inc. is an American health technology company founded in 2015 by Eric Lefkofsky in Chicago, Illinois. It was established by Lefkofsky soon after his wife was diagnosed with breast cancer. Tempus uses data and artificial intelligence (AI) to create precision medicine services, including diagnostics, for oncology, cardiology, radiology, and depression. The company went public on the Nasdaq on June 14, 2024, under the ticker symbol "TEM."

Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is an American company which operates as a multi-manager asset management business, comprising a number of individual affiliated managers, each having its own investment process and brand, and the services of unaffiliated sub advisers.

TEM vs VRTS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TEM
TEM
1.8× larger
TEM
$367.2M
$199.5M
VRTS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TEM
TEM
+87.1% gap
TEM
83.0%
-4.1%
VRTS
Higher net margin
VRTS
VRTS
18.3% more per $
VRTS
3.6%
-14.8%
TEM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TEM
TEM
Annualised
TEM
58.7%
-5.7%
VRTS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Revenue
$367.2M
$199.5M
Net Profit
$-54.2M
$7.1M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-16.7%
7.7%
Net Margin
-14.8%
3.6%
Revenue YoY
83.0%
-4.1%
Net Profit YoY
-316.2%
-78.1%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.30
$1.05

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
$199.5M
Q4 25
$367.2M
$208.0M
Q3 25
$334.2M
$216.4M
Q2 25
$314.6M
$210.5M
Q1 25
$255.7M
$217.9M
Q4 24
$200.7M
$233.5M
Q3 24
$180.9M
$227.0M
Q2 24
$166.0M
$224.4M
Net Profit
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
$7.1M
Q4 25
$-54.2M
$33.9M
Q3 25
$-80.0M
$31.3M
Q2 25
$-42.8M
$42.7M
Q1 25
$-68.0M
$28.1M
Q4 24
$-13.0M
$39.5M
Q3 24
$-75.8M
$49.1M
Q2 24
$-552.2M
$26.0M
Operating Margin
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
7.7%
Q4 25
-16.7%
19.1%
Q3 25
-18.3%
21.7%
Q2 25
-19.6%
21.5%
Q1 25
-26.9%
16.8%
Q4 24
-25.3%
21.7%
Q3 24
-29.6%
24.3%
Q2 24
-321.4%
19.7%
Net Margin
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
3.6%
Q4 25
-14.8%
16.3%
Q3 25
-23.9%
14.5%
Q2 25
-13.6%
20.3%
Q1 25
-26.6%
12.9%
Q4 24
-6.5%
16.9%
Q3 24
-41.9%
21.6%
Q2 24
-332.7%
11.6%
EPS (diluted)
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
$1.05
Q4 25
$-0.30
$5.15
Q3 25
$-0.46
$4.65
Q2 25
$-0.25
$6.12
Q1 25
$-0.40
$4.05
Q4 24
$2.56
$4.65
Q3 24
$-0.46
$5.71
Q2 24
$-6.86
$2.43

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$604.8M
$136.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$491.3M
$93.6B
Total Assets
$2.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
$136.6M
Q4 25
$604.8M
Q3 25
$655.9M
Q2 25
$186.3M
Q1 25
$151.6M
Q4 24
$341.0M
Q3 24
$388.0M
Q2 24
$478.8M
Total Debt
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$390.0M
Q3 25
$390.6M
Q2 25
$231.3M
Q1 25
$231.7M
Q4 24
$232.1M
Q3 24
$237.5M
Q2 24
$247.6M
Stockholders' Equity
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
$93.6B
Q4 25
$491.3M
$934.0M
Q3 25
$507.8M
$918.7M
Q2 25
$309.6M
$896.4M
Q1 25
$326.2M
$893.7M
Q4 24
$56.3M
$897.5M
Q3 24
$53.7M
$889.0M
Q2 24
$98.3M
$868.7M
Total Assets
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.3B
$4.3B
Q3 25
$2.3B
$3.9B
Q2 25
$1.6B
$3.7B
Q1 25
$1.5B
$3.7B
Q4 24
$926.1M
$4.0B
Q3 24
$971.7M
$3.6B
Q2 24
$864.6M
$3.6B
Debt / Equity
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.42×
Q3 25
0.43×
Q2 25
0.26×
Q1 25
0.26×
Q4 24
0.26×
Q3 24
0.27×
Q2 24
0.29×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-36.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-41.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-11.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-239.1M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-36.8M
$-67.2M
Q3 25
$-119.8M
$108.3M
Q2 25
$44.2M
$75.8M
Q1 25
$-105.6M
$-3.8M
Q4 24
$1.8M
Q3 24
$48.7M
$69.1M
Q2 24
$-97.1M
$70.0M
Free Cash Flow
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-41.5M
$-74.1M
Q3 25
$-126.5M
$106.9M
Q2 25
$36.6M
$74.2M
Q1 25
$-107.7M
$-6.8M
Q4 24
$-3.8M
Q3 24
$48.6M
$68.7M
Q2 24
$-105.1M
$68.6M
FCF Margin
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
Q4 25
-11.3%
-35.6%
Q3 25
-37.9%
49.4%
Q2 25
11.6%
35.2%
Q1 25
-42.1%
-3.1%
Q4 24
-1.6%
Q3 24
26.9%
30.3%
Q2 24
-63.3%
30.6%
Capex Intensity
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.3%
3.3%
Q3 25
2.0%
0.7%
Q2 25
2.4%
0.7%
Q1 25
0.8%
1.4%
Q4 24
2.4%
Q3 24
0.0%
0.2%
Q2 24
4.8%
0.6%
Cash Conversion
TEM
TEM
VRTS
VRTS
Q1 26
Q4 25
-1.99×
Q3 25
3.45×
Q2 25
1.77×
Q1 25
-0.13×
Q4 24
0.04×
Q3 24
1.41×
Q2 24
2.69×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

TEM
TEM

Segment breakdown not available.

VRTS
VRTS

Investment management fees$169.1M85%
Administration and shareholder service fees$17.3M9%
Distribution and service fees$11.6M6%

Related Comparisons