vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Tempus AI, Inc. (TEM) and ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. (WMS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($693.4M vs $367.2M, roughly 1.9× Tempus AI, Inc.). ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 13.5% vs -14.8%, a 28.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tempus AI, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (83.0% vs 0.4%). ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($183.6M vs $-41.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Tempus AI, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (58.7% CAGR vs 3.0%).
Tempus AI, Inc. is an American health technology company founded in 2015 by Eric Lefkofsky in Chicago, Illinois. It was established by Lefkofsky soon after his wife was diagnosed with breast cancer. Tempus uses data and artificial intelligence (AI) to create precision medicine services, including diagnostics, for oncology, cardiology, radiology, and depression. The company went public on the Nasdaq on June 14, 2024, under the ticker symbol "TEM."
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (ADS) is an American company that designs, manufactures and markets polypropylene and polyethylene pipes, plastic leach field chambers and systems, septic tanks and accessories, storm retention/detention and septic chambers, polyvinyl chloride drainage structures, fittings, and water filters and water separators. It is the largest maker of high-density polyethylene pipe in the United States. It is headquartered in Hilliard, Ohio. In 2020, 93% of the company's s...
TEM vs WMS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $367.2M | $693.4M |
| Net Profit | $-54.2M | $93.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.4% |
| Operating Margin | -16.7% | 19.7% |
| Net Margin | -14.8% | 13.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 83.0% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -316.2% | 15.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | $1.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $367.2M | $693.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.2M | $850.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $314.6M | $829.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $255.7M | $615.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.7M | $690.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.9M | $782.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $166.0M | $815.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.8M | $653.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-54.2M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-80.0M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.8M | $143.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-68.0M | $77.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | $81.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-75.8M | $130.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-552.2M | $161.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-64.7M | $94.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.5% |
| Q4 25 | -16.7% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.3% | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.6% | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.9% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.3% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.6% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -321.4% | 27.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.5% | 20.7% |
| Q4 25 | -14.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.6% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.6% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -41.9% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -332.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -44.4% | 14.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.30 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.46 | $1.99 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | $1.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.40 | $0.99 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.56 | $1.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.46 | $1.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.86 | $2.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.47 | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $604.8M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $491.3M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $604.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $655.9M | $812.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.3M | $638.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $151.6M | $463.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.0M | $488.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.0M | $613.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $478.8M | $541.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.9M | $490.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $491.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $507.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $309.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $326.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $926.1M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $971.7M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $864.6M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-36.8M | $269.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-41.5M | $183.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.3% | 26.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 12.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.88× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-239.1M | $577.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-36.8M | $269.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-119.8M | $234.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.2M | $275.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-105.6M | $41.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $189.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.7M | $166.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-97.1M | $183.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-101.4M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-41.5M | $183.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-126.5M | $176.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6M | $222.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-107.7M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $135.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.6M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-105.1M | $125.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-107.5M | $-29.8M |
| Q4 25 | -11.3% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.9% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.1% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -63.3% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -73.7% | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.2% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.88× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TEM
Segment breakdown not available.
WMS
| Reportable Segment Aggregation Before Other Operating Segment | $557.3M | 80% |
| Other | $85.5M | 12% |
| Pipe | $35.5M | 5% |
| Allied Products And Other | $15.0M | 2% |
