vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Teradyne (TER) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.3B, roughly 2.0× Teradyne). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs 22.4%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs 14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (32.6% CAGR vs 29.9%).
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
TER vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $398.9M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 60.9% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 36.9% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 31.1% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 87.0% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.53 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $769.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $651.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $685.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $752.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $729.9M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $398.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $257.2M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.6M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.9M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.3M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.6M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $159.3M |
| Q1 26 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.2% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.4% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.2% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.6% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.4% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.2% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.3% | 74.9% |
| Q1 26 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.1% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.9% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.6% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | $2.53 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.75 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.61 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.89 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.14 | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $241.9M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $0 | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $241.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $293.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $272.7M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $339.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $553.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $510.0M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $421.9M | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $13.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $265.1M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.66× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $265.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $281.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.1M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $161.6M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $282.6M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.3M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.1M | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.7M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.6M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.2M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.4M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | $209.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.16× | 1.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TER
Segment breakdown not available.
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
