vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Teradyne (TER) and UPBOUND GROUP, INC. (UPBD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× UPBOUND GROUP, INC.). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs 1.7%, a 29.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs 10.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (32.6% CAGR vs 4.5%).
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
Upbound Group, Inc. is a leading US provider of flexible lease-to-own solutions for consumer goods. It offers furniture, consumer electronics, home appliances, and accessories, catering to customers seeking accessible payment alternatives to traditional retail financing.
TER vs UPBD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $398.9M | $19.7M |
| Gross Margin | 60.9% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | 36.9% | 4.8% |
| Net Margin | 31.1% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 87.0% | 10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -36.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.53 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $769.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $651.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $685.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $752.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $729.9M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $398.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $257.2M | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.6M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.9M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.3M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.6M | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $33.9M |
| Q1 26 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.2% | 49.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.4% | 48.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.2% | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.6% | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.4% | 47.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.2% | 47.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.3% | 49.4% |
| Q1 26 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | 7.5% |
| Q1 26 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | $2.53 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.75 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.61 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.89 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.14 | $0.61 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $241.9M | $120.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $0 | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $695.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $241.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $293.8M | $120.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $272.7M | $107.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $339.3M | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.6M | $107.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $553.4M | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $510.0M | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $421.9M | $82.5M |
| Q1 26 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $695.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $687.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $685.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $679.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $629.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $611.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $596.3M |
| Q1 26 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $2.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $265.1M | $41.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $24.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.66× | 2.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $238.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $265.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $281.6M | $41.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.0M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.1M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $161.6M | $137.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $282.6M | $-61.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.3M | $106.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.1M | $15.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.8M | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $97.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.7M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.6M | $127.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.2M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.4M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | $613.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | 2.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 8.96× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.32× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | 5.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | -2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | 3.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.16× | 0.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
