vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Teradyne (TER) and Waters Corporation (WAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $932.4M, roughly 1.2× Waters Corporation). Waters Corporation runs the higher net margin — 24.2% vs 23.7%, a 0.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.9% vs 6.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (34.4% CAGR vs 21.0%).
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
Waters Corporation is an American company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts that provides analytical instruments and software used for chromatography, mass spectrometry, laboratory informatics, and rheometry by the life sciences, materials, and food industries.
TER vs WAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $932.4M |
| Net Profit | $257.2M | $225.2M |
| Gross Margin | 57.2% | 61.1% |
| Operating Margin | 27.1% | 29.0% |
| Net Margin | 23.7% | 24.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 43.9% | 6.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 75.9% | -2.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $3.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $932.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $769.2M | $799.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $651.8M | $771.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $685.7M | $661.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $752.9M | $872.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.3M | $740.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $729.9M | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $599.8M | $636.8M |
| Q4 25 | $257.2M | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.6M | $148.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $147.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.9M | $121.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.3M | $231.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.6M | $161.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | $142.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.2M | $102.2M |
| Q4 25 | 57.2% | 61.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.4% | 59.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.2% | 58.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.6% | 58.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.4% | 60.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.2% | 59.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.3% | 59.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.6% | 58.9% |
| Q4 25 | 27.1% | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.9% | 24.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.4% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.6% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.0% | 21.0% |
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | 20.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 16.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $3.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.75 | $2.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $2.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.61 | $2.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | $3.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.89 | $2.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.14 | $2.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.40 | $1.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.8M | $587.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.8B | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.55× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $293.8M | $587.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $272.7M | $459.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $339.3M | $367.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.6M | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $553.4M | $325.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $510.0M | $331.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $421.9M | $327.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $707.4M | $338.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $281.6M | $164.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $218.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 20.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.09× | 0.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $450.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $281.6M | $164.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.0M | $187.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.1M | $41.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $161.6M | $259.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $282.6M | $240.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.3M | $204.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.1M | $54.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3M | $262.9M |
| Q4 25 | $218.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.32× | 0.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | 2.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.16× | 0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.11× | 2.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TER
| Soc | $646.5M | 60% |
| Memory | $206.5M | 19% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $90.0M | 8% |
| Universal Robots | $89.4M | 8% |
| IST | $30.5M | 3% |
| Transferred Over Time | $20.5M | 2% |
WAT
Segment breakdown not available.
