vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tecnoglass Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.3M vs $132.6M, roughly 1.8× Urban Edge Properties). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs 10.6%, a 6.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Urban Edge Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.2% vs 2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 11.6%).
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
TGLS vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $245.3M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $26.1M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 40.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.6% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.4% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.5% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.57 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $245.3M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $260.5M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.5M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $222.3M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.6M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.3M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $219.7M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.1M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.1M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.0M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.3% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.0% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.3% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.3% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.57 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.01 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.94 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.90 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.00 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.05 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $104.1M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $174.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $713.1M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.1M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $127.1M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.9M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $160.2M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.5M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.8M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.5M | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $174.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $713.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $764.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $736.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $685.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $631.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $613.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $574.8M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $996.3M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $942.5M | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.25× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.0M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $11.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.0% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $34.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.0M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.0M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.9M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.9M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.1M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.5M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.5M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.2M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.7M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.4M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.8M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.19× | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.11× | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.30× | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.84× | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.98× | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
