vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. (TKLF) and VERRA MOBILITY Corp (VRRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VERRA MOBILITY Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($257.9M vs $190.4M, roughly 1.4× Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.).
Ten Lifestyle Group is a global travel and lifestyle concierge company founded in 1998 by Alex Cheatle and Andrew Long. The company's headquarters is based in London with 22 global offices in major cities including New York, Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore and Tokyo. Alex Cheatle is the company's Chief Executive Officer (CEO).
Verra Mobility Corp is a leading global smart mobility technology solution provider. It delivers toll management, parking and traffic compliance enforcement, connected vehicle services, and fleet management tools, serving government transport agencies, rental car operators, commercial fleet owners, and automotive partners across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.
TKLF vs VRRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.4M | $257.9M |
| Net Profit | — | $18.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 16.7% |
| Net Margin | — | 7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 128.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $257.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.4M | $261.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $236.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $223.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $221.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $222.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $209.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -30.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $65.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $43.0M | $293.0M |
| Total Assets | — | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $65.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $147.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $108.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $77.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $206.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $149.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | $293.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.0M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $352.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $299.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $265.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $486.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $438.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $449.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.31× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $40.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $5.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 13.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $136.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $75.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.18× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TKLF
Segment breakdown not available.
VRRM
| Services | $239.5M | 93% |
| CA | $8.4M | 3% |
| GB | $5.7M | 2% |
| Other Customer | $1.6M | 1% |
| Parking Solutions | $1.1M | 0% |
