vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TripAdvisor, Inc. (TRIP) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLYMPIC STEEL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($490.7M vs $411.0M, roughly 1.2× TripAdvisor, Inc.). OLYMPIC STEEL INC runs the higher net margin — 0.4% vs -9.2%, a 9.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLYMPIC STEEL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs 0.0%). OLYMPIC STEEL INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-12.9M vs $-122.0M). Over the past eight quarters, TripAdvisor, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.0% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Tripadvisor is an American company that operates online travel agencies, comparison shopping websites, and mobile apps with user-generated content.
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
TRIP vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $411.0M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 91.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.3% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | -9.2% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.0% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3900.0% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.32 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $411.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $553.0M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $529.0M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $398.0M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $411.0M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $532.0M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $497.0M | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $395.0M | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.0M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.0M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-59.0M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 91.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 92.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 92.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 93.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 93.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 92.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 92.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 93.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | -9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.9% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.32 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.43 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.27 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.17 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.43 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $819.0M | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $645.0M | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.27× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $819.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $821.0M | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $822.0M | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $831.0M | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $832.0M | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $645.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $707.0M | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $627.0M | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $643.0M | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.0M | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $944.0M | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $857.0M | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $825.0M | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.16× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.81× | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.88× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-103.0M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-122.0M | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -29.7% | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.6% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $163.0M | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-103.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.0M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $202.0M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.0M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.0M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.0M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.0M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-122.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.0M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.0M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-63.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.0M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.0M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | -29.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.1% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.61× | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.00× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.10× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TRIP
| Third Party | $327.0M | 80% |
| The Fork | $58.0M | 14% |
| Other | $26.0M | 6% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |