vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TRUPANION, INC. (TRUP) and Vroom, Inc. (VRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRUPANION, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($376.9M vs $235.9M, roughly 1.6× Vroom, Inc.). On growth, Vroom, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 11.7%). TRUPANION, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($25.3M vs $-108.8M). Over the past eight quarters, TRUPANION, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (11.0% CAGR vs -49.5%).
TRUPANION, INC.TRUPEarnings & Financial Report
Trupanion, Inc. is a pet insurance provider headquartered in Seattle, Washington. Established in 1998, Trupanion operates across the United States, Canada, Australia, and Puerto Rico. The company offers coverage for pets and is self-underwritten by the American Pet Insurance Company (APIC).
Vroom, Inc. is a parent company of United Auto Credit Corporation (UACC) and CarStory. Previously, Vroom was a used car retailer and e-commerce company that let consumers buy, sell, and finance cars online. Vroom ceased e-commerce automotive sales operations on January 22, 2024.
TRUP vs VRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2023
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $376.9M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | — | $-141.1M |
| Gross Margin | 17.3% | 12.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | -11.5% |
| Net Margin | — | -59.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.7% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -669.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-80.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $376.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $366.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $353.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $342.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $337.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $314.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $306.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.16 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $370.7M | $135.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $101.8M | $454.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $383.9M | $127.7M |
| Total Assets | $915.0M | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.27× | 3.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $370.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $348.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $321.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $307.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $277.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $275.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $101.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $383.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $368.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $355.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $333.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $323.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $320.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $303.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $915.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $880.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $847.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $837.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $806.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $816.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $795.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $789.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.3M | $-108.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $25.3M | $-108.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.7% | -46.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $75.4M | $-536.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-631.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TRUP
| Subscriptionbusiness | $261.4M | 69% |
| Other | $115.4M | 31% |
VRM
Segment breakdown not available.