vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Trane Technologies (TT) and Tennessee Valley Authority (TVE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Trane Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.0B vs $3.0B, roughly 1.6× Tennessee Valley Authority). Trane Technologies runs the higher net margin — 11.9% vs 8.7%, a 3.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Trane Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.0% vs 4.4%). Trane Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($573.0M vs $-814.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tennessee Valley Authority's revenue compounded faster (-1.7% CAGR vs -3.2%).
Trane Technologies plc is an Irish domiciled company focused on heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and refrigeration systems. The company traces its corporate history back more than 150 years and was created after a series of mergers and spin-offs. In 2008, HVAC manufacturer Trane was acquired by Ingersoll Rand, a US industrial tools manufacturer. In 2020, the tools business was spun off as Ingersoll Rand and the remaining company was renamed Trane Technologies.
The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is a federally-owned electric utility corporation in the United States. TVA's service area covers all of Tennessee, portions of Alabama, Mississippi, and Kentucky, and small areas of Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia. While owned by the federal government, TVA receives no taxpayer funding and operates similarly to a private for-profit company. It is headquartered in Knoxville, Tennessee, and is the sixth-largest power supplier and largest public utilit...
TT vs TVE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.0B | $3.0B |
| Net Profit | $589.5M | $266.0M |
| Gross Margin | 165.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.6% | 18.1% |
| Net Margin | 11.9% | 8.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.0% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.4% | 112.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $589.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $591.3M | $266.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $847.6M | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $874.8M | $212.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $604.9M | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $604.3M | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $772.0M | $520.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $755.3M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | 165.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.3% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.64 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.78 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.89 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.67 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.65 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.39 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.30 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $501.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6B | — |
| Total Assets | $22.8B | $59.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $501.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $501.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $502.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $507.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $502.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $501.0M |
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $8.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $22.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $21.4B | $59.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.4B | $60.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.0B | $59.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1B | $59.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.1B | $58.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.9B | $57.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.2B | $56.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $330.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $573.0M | $-814.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.5% | -26.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 37.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $692.1M | $615.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $339.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $899.9M | $450.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $695.9M | $508.0M |
| Q1 26 | $573.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-814.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $935.6M | $233.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $602.2M | $-431.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $220.6M | $-176.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.3M | $-759.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $164.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $623.0M | $-248.0M |
| Q1 26 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.5% | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | -26.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | -8.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 26.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.96× | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 2.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.79× | 2.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 2.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 3.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.92× | 2.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TT
| Americas | $4.0B | 80% |
| EMEA | $639.5M | 13% |
| Asia Pacific | $331.5M | 7% |
TVE
| TN | $2.0B | 65% |
| AL | $449.0M | 15% |
| MS | $266.0M | 9% |
| KY | $193.0M | 6% |
| GA | $75.0M | 2% |
| Federal Agencies And Other | $29.0M | 1% |
| NC | $23.0M | 1% |
| VA | $12.0M | 0% |
| Off System Sales Member | $2.0M | 0% |
