vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ServiceTitan, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($249.2M vs $132.6M, roughly 1.9× Urban Edge Properties). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs -15.9%, a 32.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ServiceTitan, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.0% vs 12.2%).
Alphabet Inc. is an American multinational technology conglomerate holding company headquartered in Mountain View, California. It was created through a restructuring of Google on October 2, 2015, and became the parent holding company of Google and several former Google subsidiaries. Alphabet is listed on the large-cap section of the Nasdaq under the ticker symbols GOOGL and GOOG; both classes of stock are components of major stock market indices such as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100. Alphabet ha...
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
TTAN vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $249.2M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $-39.5M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 70.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -16.9% | — |
| Net Margin | -15.9% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 25.0% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.9% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.42 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $249.2M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.1M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.7M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $209.3M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.3M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.3M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-39.5M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-32.2M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-46.4M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-100.9M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-56.0M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 70.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -16.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.4% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.0% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -47.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.1% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.4% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.3% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.5% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -48.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.9% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.42 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.35 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.51 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.34 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.74 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.02 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $493.2M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $103.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.07× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $493.2M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $471.5M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $420.3M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $441.8M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.8M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.2M | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $103.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $174.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-576.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-506.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $43.8M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $42.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.8M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.3M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.6M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.5M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.2M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.2M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.2M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.5M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.9M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.9% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.4% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.7% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TTAN
| Subscription Revenue | $182.8M | 73% |
| Usage Revenue | $56.8M | 23% |
| Professional Services And Other Revenue | $9.6M | 4% |
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
