vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Twin Hospitality Group Inc. (TWNP) and UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC (USLM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($87.9M vs $82.3M, roughly 1.1× Twin Hospitality Group Inc.). UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC runs the higher net margin — 34.7% vs -29.7%, a 64.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($25.7M vs $-7.4M).

Target Hospitality is a company that provides workforce lodging and other temporary, modular housing used for oil, gas and mining operations; large-scale events; and disaster relief. Target Hospitality is based in The Woodlands, Texas, and also has offices in Williston, North Dakota; Denver, Colorado; Calgary, Alberta.

United States Lime & Minerals Inc is a leading US-based natural resources enterprise that produces high-calcium lime, dolomitic lime, limestone and related mineral products. Its core client segments cover infrastructure construction, steel manufacturing, agricultural soil amendment, environmental emission control and industrial processing, serving customers across North America.

TWNP vs USLM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
USLM
USLM
1.1× larger
USLM
$87.9M
$82.3M
TWNP
Higher net margin
USLM
USLM
64.5% more per $
USLM
34.7%
-29.7%
TWNP
More free cash flow
USLM
USLM
$33.1M more FCF
USLM
$25.7M
$-7.4M
TWNP

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Revenue
$82.3M
$87.9M
Net Profit
$-24.5M
$30.5M
Gross Margin
48.0%
Operating Margin
-16.2%
41.0%
Net Margin
-29.7%
34.7%
Revenue YoY
9.8%
Net Profit YoY
13.2%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.43
$1.06

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
$87.9M
Q3 25
$82.3M
$102.0M
Q2 25
$87.8M
$91.5M
Q1 25
$87.1M
$91.3M
Q4 24
$80.1M
Q3 24
$89.4M
Q2 24
$76.5M
Q1 24
$71.7M
Net Profit
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
$30.5M
Q3 25
$-24.5M
$38.8M
Q2 25
$-20.8M
$30.8M
Q1 25
$-12.1M
$34.1M
Q4 24
$27.0M
Q3 24
$33.4M
Q2 24
$26.1M
Q1 24
$22.4M
Gross Margin
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
48.0%
Q3 25
51.2%
Q2 25
45.8%
Q1 25
50.6%
Q4 24
44.3%
Q3 24
48.2%
Q2 24
45.5%
Q1 24
42.7%
Operating Margin
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
41.0%
Q3 25
-16.2%
45.3%
Q2 25
-13.2%
39.0%
Q1 25
-1.2%
43.7%
Q4 24
38.8%
Q3 24
42.6%
Q2 24
39.1%
Q1 24
35.9%
Net Margin
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
34.7%
Q3 25
-29.7%
38.0%
Q2 25
-23.7%
33.7%
Q1 25
-13.9%
37.4%
Q4 24
33.7%
Q3 24
37.3%
Q2 24
34.0%
Q1 24
31.3%
EPS (diluted)
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
$1.06
Q3 25
$-0.43
$1.35
Q2 25
$-0.38
$1.07
Q1 25
$-0.26
$1.19
Q4 24
$-2.20
Q3 24
$1.16
Q2 24
$0.91
Q1 24
$3.92

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$371.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$402.8M
$0
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-92.1M
$630.8M
Total Assets
$516.8M
$681.0M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
$371.1M
Q3 25
$349.5M
Q2 25
$319.9M
Q1 25
$300.6M
Q4 24
$278.0M
Q3 24
$255.0M
Q2 24
$222.5M
Q1 24
$207.0M
Total Debt
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
$0
Q3 25
$402.8M
$0
Q2 25
$411.3M
$0
Q1 25
$413.0M
$0
Q4 24
$0
Q3 24
$0
Q2 24
$0
Q1 24
$0
Stockholders' Equity
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
$630.8M
Q3 25
$-92.1M
$602.3M
Q2 25
$-78.6M
$563.3M
Q1 25
$-101.9M
$532.2M
Q4 24
$497.7M
Q3 24
$474.2M
Q2 24
$441.1M
Q1 24
$415.3M
Total Assets
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
$681.0M
Q3 25
$516.8M
$652.8M
Q2 25
$535.1M
$607.4M
Q1 25
$544.2M
$585.3M
Q4 24
$543.2M
Q3 24
$521.8M
Q2 24
$484.2M
Q1 24
$464.0M
Debt / Equity
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
0.00×
Q3 25
0.00×
Q2 25
0.00×
Q1 25
0.00×
Q4 24
0.00×
Q3 24
0.00×
Q2 24
0.00×
Q1 24
0.00×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-5.9M
$45.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-7.4M
$25.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-9.0%
29.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.9%
22.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.49×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$102.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
$45.6M
Q3 25
$-5.9M
$45.9M
Q2 25
$-8.8M
$34.0M
Q1 25
$-5.7M
$39.4M
Q4 24
$38.6M
Q3 24
$39.0M
Q2 24
$21.2M
Q1 24
$27.2M
Free Cash Flow
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
$25.7M
Q3 25
$-7.4M
$31.3M
Q2 25
$-10.6M
$20.8M
Q1 25
$-9.7M
$24.6M
Q4 24
$27.6M
Q3 24
$33.9M
Q2 24
$16.8M
Q1 24
$20.3M
FCF Margin
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
29.2%
Q3 25
-9.0%
30.7%
Q2 25
-12.1%
22.7%
Q1 25
-11.2%
26.9%
Q4 24
34.4%
Q3 24
37.9%
Q2 24
21.9%
Q1 24
28.4%
Capex Intensity
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
22.6%
Q3 25
1.9%
14.4%
Q2 25
2.1%
14.5%
Q1 25
4.6%
16.3%
Q4 24
13.8%
Q3 24
5.8%
Q2 24
5.7%
Q1 24
9.5%
Cash Conversion
TWNP
TWNP
USLM
USLM
Q4 25
1.49×
Q3 25
1.18×
Q2 25
1.10×
Q1 25
1.16×
Q4 24
1.43×
Q3 24
1.17×
Q2 24
0.81×
Q1 24
1.21×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons