vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of U-BX Technology Ltd. (UBXG) and Americas Gold & Silver Corp (USAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Americas Gold & Silver Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.1M vs $12.4M, roughly 1.5× U-BX Technology Ltd.). U-BX Technology Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -24.7% vs -82.3%, a 57.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Pan American Silver Corporation is a mining company based in Canada with operations in Latin America. The company has mines and other projects in Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina.
UBXG vs USAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.4M | $19.1M |
| Net Profit | $-3.1M | $-15.7M |
| Gross Margin | 0.4% | 34.2% |
| Operating Margin | -22.1% | — |
| Net Margin | -24.7% | -82.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -28.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 2.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.55 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $19.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $26.5M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-15.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.6% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -60.9% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $39.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $19.0M | $50.2M |
| Total Assets | $21.0M | $234.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $53.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | $234.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $-12.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-41.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -216.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 150.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-41.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-11.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | -216.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -42.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | 150.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.2% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
