vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of UNITED FIRE GROUP INC (UFCS) and USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC (USNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNITED FIRE GROUP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($365.8M vs $250.2M, roughly 1.5× USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC). On growth, UNITED FIRE GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs -3.0%). Over the past eight quarters, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs 11.2%).
The United Fruit Company was an American multinational corporation that traded in tropical fruit grown on Latin American plantations and sold in the United States and Europe. The company was formed in 1899 from the merger of the Boston Fruit Company with Minor C. Keith's banana-trading enterprises. It flourished in the early and mid-20th century, and it came to control vast territories and transportation networks in Central America, the Caribbean coast of Colombia, and the West Indies. Althou...
Usana Health Sciences, Inc., or USANA, is an American multi-level marketing company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of 2021, Usana was the 14th largest direct-selling company in the world by revenue. The company manufactures most of its nutritional products, dietary supplements, and skincare products at a Salt Lake City facility. Its products are sold in 24 countries via a network of independent distributors.
UFCS vs USNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $365.8M | $250.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $7.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 5.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 3.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | -3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -20.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.45 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $250.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $365.8M | $226.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $354.0M | $213.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $335.5M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $331.1M | $249.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.2M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $323.0M | $200.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $301.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $180.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.2M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.7M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 76.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.45 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.49 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.87 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.67 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $156.3M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $941.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $3.8B | $739.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $156.3M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $233.7M | $145.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $202.1M | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.7M | $179.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.9M | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.4M | $364.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $941.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $898.7M | $528.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $845.7M | $531.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $817.7M | $529.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $781.5M | $532.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $785.8M | $533.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $726.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $739.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $742.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $726.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $734.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $746.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $671.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $269.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $269.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.8M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.4M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.7M | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.3M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.5M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.33× | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.86× | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.