vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of U-Haul Holding Co (UHAL) and MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp (VAC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
U-Haul Holding Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp). U-Haul Holding Co runs the higher net margin — 2.6% vs -35.0%, a 37.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, U-Haul Holding Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.9% vs -0.7%). MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-6.0M vs $-447.6M).
U-Haul Holding Company is an American moving truck, trailer, and self-storage rental company, based in Phoenix, Arizona that has been in operation since 1945. The company was founded by Leonard Shoen and Anna Mary Carty in Ridgefield, Washington who began it in a garage owned by Carty's family, and expanded it through franchising with gas stations. U-Haul has been known to rent to 50 states of the U.S. and the 10 Canadian Provinces.
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation is a pure-play public timeshare company. Formerly a division of Marriott International, Marriott Vacations Worldwide was established as a separate, publicly traded entity focusing primarily on vacation ownership in November 2011. Marriott Vacations Worldwide runs more than 120 resorts with over 700,000 Owners and members in a diverse portfolio of brands under The Marriott Vacation Clubs name. Its brands include Marriott Vacation Club, The Marriott Vaca...
UHAL vs VAC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $37.0M | $-431.0M |
| Gross Margin | 96.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 2.6% | -35.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.9% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -45.0% | -962.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-12.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $232.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $37.0M | $-431.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.3M | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | 96.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 96.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | -35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.46 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $406.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.7B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $21.6B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.04× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $406.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $474.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $877.2M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $196.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $206.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $237.0M |
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $21.6B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.4B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $240.6M | $6.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-447.6M | $-6.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -31.6% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 48.6% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.51× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-29.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $240.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $551.6M | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $598.4M | $-48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-447.6M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-446.3M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-318.2M | $-68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $86.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-13.0M |
| Q4 25 | -31.6% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -137.1% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 48.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 395.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 6.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.20× | -0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
UHAL
| Long Term Contract With Customer | $1.2B | 82% |
| CA | $74.0M | 5% |
| Life Insurance | $56.2M | 4% |
| Accident And Health Insurance Segment | $49.8M | 4% |
| Investments Segment | $47.3M | 3% |
| Property And Casualty Insurance | $42.5M | 3% |
| Mercury | $1.6M | 0% |
VAC
| Cost Reimbursement | $467.0M | 38% |
| Time Share | $381.0M | 31% |
| Management And Exchange | $212.0M | 17% |
| Ancillary Revenues | $64.0M | 5% |
| Management Service | $55.0M | 4% |
| Service Other | $36.0M | 3% |
