vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of United Homes Group, Inc. (UHG) and Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.\DE (VRDN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
United Homes Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($123.4M vs $70.6M, roughly 1.7× Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.\DE). United Homes Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 2.6% vs -49.0%, a 51.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Viridian Therapeutics, Inc.\DE posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (81958.1% vs -8.5%). United Homes Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($616.0K vs $-84.7M).
Invitation Homes Inc. is a public company traded on the New York Stock Exchange. It is headquartered in the Lincoln Center building in Dallas, Texas. Dallas B. Tanner is chief executive officer. As of 2017, the company was reportedly the largest owner of single-family rental homes in the United States. As of July 2024, the company owned about 84,000 rental homes in 16 markets. Seventeen percent of their rental income is from California.
Viridian Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology firm developing novel disease-modifying therapies for rare, serious autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Its lead pipeline candidate targets thyroid eye disease, a debilitating orbital disorder, with primary market focus on North America and Europe.
UHG vs VRDN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $123.4M | $70.6M |
| Net Profit | $3.2M | $-34.6M |
| Gross Margin | 17.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | -56.7% |
| Net Margin | 2.6% | -49.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.5% | 81958.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 380.4% | 54.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $123.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.8M | $70.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $100.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-31.3M | $-34.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $667.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.7% | -56.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -34.5% | -49.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.53 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.44 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $24.4M | $490.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $67.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $57.4M | $503.0M |
| Total Assets | $276.6M | $577.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.6M | $490.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $67.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.9M | $503.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $276.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $293.1M | $577.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $281.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $266.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $265.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $284.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4M | $-84.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $616.0K | $-84.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.5% | -120.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.44× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-21.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.8M | $-84.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $616.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.8M | $-84.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.3% | -120.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.72× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
UHG
| GSH South Carolina | $116.3M | 94% |
| Rosewood | $5.9M | 5% |
| Other Segment | $1.1M | 1% |
VRDN
Segment breakdown not available.
