vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Universal Health Services (UHS) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Universal Health Services is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.5B vs $2.6B, roughly 1.7× Vertiv Holdings Co). Vertiv Holdings Co runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs 8.0%, a 6.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vertiv Holdings Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.1% vs 8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Vertiv Holdings Co's revenue compounded faster (16.5% CAGR vs 7.3%).

Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is an American Fortune 500 company that provides hospital and healthcare services, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. In 2024, UHS reported total revenues of $15.8 billion.

Vertiv is an American multinational provider of critical infrastructure and services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments.

UHS vs VRT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
UHS
UHS
1.7× larger
UHS
$4.5B
$2.6B
VRT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VRT
VRT
+21.9% gap
VRT
30.1%
8.2%
UHS
Higher net margin
VRT
VRT
6.7% more per $
VRT
14.7%
8.0%
UHS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VRT
VRT
Annualised
VRT
16.5%
7.3%
UHS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Revenue
$4.5B
$2.6B
Net Profit
$358.7M
$390.1M
Gross Margin
37.7%
Operating Margin
11.2%
Net Margin
8.0%
14.7%
Revenue YoY
8.2%
30.1%
Net Profit YoY
11.5%
EPS (diluted)
$5.65
$0.99

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$4.5B
$2.6B
Q4 25
$4.5B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$4.5B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$4.3B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$4.1B
$2.0B
Q4 24
$4.1B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$4.0B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$3.9B
$2.0B
Net Profit
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$358.7M
$390.1M
Q4 25
$445.9M
$445.6M
Q3 25
$373.0M
$398.5M
Q2 25
$353.2M
$324.2M
Q1 25
$316.7M
$164.5M
Q4 24
$332.4M
$147.0M
Q3 24
$258.7M
$176.6M
Q2 24
$289.2M
$178.1M
Gross Margin
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
37.7%
Q4 25
38.9%
Q3 25
37.8%
Q2 25
34.0%
Q1 25
33.7%
Q4 24
37.1%
Q3 24
36.5%
Q2 24
38.0%
Operating Margin
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
11.2%
Q4 25
11.5%
20.1%
Q3 25
11.6%
19.3%
Q2 25
11.7%
16.8%
Q1 25
11.1%
14.3%
Q4 24
11.5%
19.5%
Q3 24
9.7%
17.9%
Q2 24
11.2%
17.2%
Net Margin
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
8.0%
14.7%
Q4 25
9.9%
15.5%
Q3 25
8.3%
14.9%
Q2 25
8.2%
12.3%
Q1 25
7.7%
8.1%
Q4 24
8.1%
6.3%
Q3 24
6.5%
8.5%
Q2 24
7.4%
9.1%
EPS (diluted)
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$5.65
$0.99
Q4 25
$7.01
$1.14
Q3 25
$5.86
$1.02
Q2 25
$5.43
$0.83
Q1 25
$4.80
$0.42
Q4 24
$4.94
$0.38
Q3 24
$3.80
$0.46
Q2 24
$4.26
$0.46

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$119.0M
$2.5B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.7B
$0
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$7.5B
$4.2B
Total Assets
$15.7B
$13.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.63×
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$119.0M
$2.5B
Q4 25
$137.8M
$1.7B
Q3 25
$112.9M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$137.6M
$1.6B
Q1 25
$126.8M
$1.5B
Q4 24
$126.0M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$106.1M
$908.7M
Q2 24
$128.8M
$579.7M
Total Debt
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$4.7B
$0
Q4 25
$4.8B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$4.7B
$2.9B
Q2 25
$4.6B
$2.9B
Q1 25
$4.6B
$2.9B
Q4 24
$4.5B
$2.9B
Q3 24
$4.7B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$4.5B
$2.9B
Stockholders' Equity
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$7.5B
$4.2B
Q4 25
$7.3B
$3.9B
Q3 25
$7.2B
$3.5B
Q2 25
$7.0B
$3.1B
Q1 25
$6.8B
$2.7B
Q4 24
$6.7B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$6.6B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$6.5B
$1.5B
Total Assets
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$15.7B
$13.4B
Q4 25
$15.5B
$12.2B
Q3 25
$15.3B
$10.8B
Q2 25
$15.0B
$10.4B
Q1 25
$14.9B
$9.5B
Q4 24
$14.5B
$9.1B
Q3 24
$14.4B
$8.9B
Q2 24
$14.1B
$8.1B
Debt / Equity
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
0.63×
0.00×
Q4 25
0.65×
0.74×
Q3 25
0.66×
0.83×
Q2 25
0.65×
0.93×
Q1 25
0.68×
1.10×
Q4 24
0.68×
1.20×
Q3 24
0.71×
1.62×
Q2 24
0.69×
1.91×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$401.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$652.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
24.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.8%
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.12×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$2.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$401.6M
Q4 25
$574.7M
$978.9M
Q3 25
$380.7M
$508.7M
Q2 25
$549.0M
$322.9M
Q1 25
$360.0M
$303.3M
Q4 24
$658.4M
$425.2M
Q3 24
$333.0M
$378.2M
Q2 24
$679.3M
$378.4M
Free Cash Flow
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$652.8M
Q4 25
$293.5M
$885.6M
Q3 25
$151.8M
$463.5M
Q2 25
$283.0M
$277.9M
Q1 25
$121.0M
$266.8M
Q4 24
$412.5M
$364.5M
Q3 24
$85.0M
$341.8M
Q2 24
$437.9M
$344.3M
FCF Margin
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
24.6%
Q4 25
6.5%
30.8%
Q3 25
3.4%
17.3%
Q2 25
6.6%
10.5%
Q1 25
3.0%
13.1%
Q4 24
10.0%
15.5%
Q3 24
2.1%
16.5%
Q2 24
11.2%
17.6%
Capex Intensity
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
4.8%
4.2%
Q4 25
6.3%
3.2%
Q3 25
5.1%
1.7%
Q2 25
6.2%
1.7%
Q1 25
5.8%
1.8%
Q4 24
6.0%
2.6%
Q3 24
6.3%
1.8%
Q2 24
6.2%
1.7%
Cash Conversion
UHS
UHS
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
1.12×
Q4 25
1.29×
2.20×
Q3 25
1.02×
1.28×
Q2 25
1.55×
1.00×
Q1 25
1.14×
1.84×
Q4 24
1.98×
2.89×
Q3 24
1.29×
2.14×
Q2 24
2.35×
2.12×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons