vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of UNISYS CORP (UIS) and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNISYS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($574.5M vs $340.0M, roughly 1.7× Walker & Dunlop, Inc.). UNISYS CORP runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs -12.9%, a 16.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNISYS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.3% vs -0.4%). UNISYS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($97.3M vs $-680.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs 8.5%).
Unisys Corporation is a technology company founded in 1986 and headquartered in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania. The company provides cloud, AI, digital workplace, logistics, and enterprise computing services.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is one of the largest commercial real estate finance and advisory services firms in the United States and internationally.
UIS vs WD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $574.5M | $340.0M |
| Net Profit | $18.7M | $-13.9M |
| Gross Margin | 33.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.3% | -17.2% |
| Net Margin | 3.3% | -12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.3% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -37.7% | -131.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $-0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $574.5M | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $460.2M | $337.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $483.3M | $319.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $432.1M | $237.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $545.4M | $341.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $497.0M | $292.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $478.2M | $270.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $487.8M | $228.1M |
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-308.9M | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.1M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-29.5M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-61.9M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.0M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-149.5M | $11.9M |
| Q4 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.3% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 6.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | -12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -67.1% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.2% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.5% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.6% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.24 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.33 | $0.98 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.28 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.42 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.45 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.89 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.18 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $413.9M | $299.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $729.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-282.6M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $413.9M | $299.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.9M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $300.8M | $233.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $393.1M | $181.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $376.5M | $279.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $373.7M | $179.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.9M | $208.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.8M | $216.5M |
| Q4 25 | $729.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $723.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $692.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $488.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $488.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $489.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $488.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-282.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-300.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-221.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-267.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-283.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-202.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-174.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-158.6M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $3.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $104.9M | $-664.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $97.3M | $-680.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.9% | -200.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.61× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-170.0M | $-2.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $104.9M | $-664.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.0M | $-948.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-316.2M | $-238.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.3M | $-281.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.6M | $129.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | $-202.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $-237.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.8M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $97.3M | $-680.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.4M | $-950.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-324.1M | $-241.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.4M | $-284.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.5M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.2M | $-204.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.0M | $-241.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.1M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | 16.9% | -200.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | -281.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -67.1% | -75.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | -120.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | -69.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.3% | -89.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -28.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -102.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.55× | 2.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.49× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
