vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) and UNITIL CORP (UTL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Wheels Up Experience Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($183.8M vs $161.5M, roughly 1.1× UNITIL CORP). UNITIL CORP runs the higher net margin — 11.8% vs -15.7%, a 27.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNITIL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.7% vs -10.2%). UNITIL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-36.3M vs $-58.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Wheels Up Experience Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-3.4% CAGR vs -4.9%).

Wheels Up is a provider of "on demand" private aviation in the United States and one of the largest private aviation companies in the world. It was founded in 2013 by Kenny Dichter, using a membership/on-demand business model. Wheels Up members can book private aircraft from the company fleet and third-party operators using a mobile application.

Unitil Corporation is an interstate electricity and natural gas utility company that provides services for New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Maine. Its earliest predecessor company, the Portland Gas Light Company, was founded in Maine in 1849. The current company was set up in 1984 and is based in New Hampshire. With a market cap of 686.51M, it provides electric services to about 102,400 customers and natural gas to over 75,900 customers. The service territory of Unitil includes business distr...

UP vs UTL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
UP
UP
1.1× larger
UP
$183.8M
$161.5M
UTL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
UTL
UTL
+36.9% gap
UTL
26.7%
-10.2%
UP
Higher net margin
UTL
UTL
27.5% more per $
UTL
11.8%
-15.7%
UP
More free cash flow
UTL
UTL
$22.0M more FCF
UTL
$-36.3M
$-58.3M
UP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
UP
UP
Annualised
UP
-3.4%
-4.9%
UTL

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Revenue
$183.8M
$161.5M
Net Profit
$-28.9M
$19.0M
Gross Margin
14.3%
Operating Margin
-0.9%
21.5%
Net Margin
-15.7%
11.8%
Revenue YoY
-10.2%
26.7%
Net Profit YoY
67.0%
21.8%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.04
$1.05

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
$183.8M
$161.5M
Q3 25
$185.5M
$101.1M
Q2 25
$189.6M
$102.6M
Q1 25
$177.5M
$170.8M
Q4 24
$204.8M
$127.5M
Q3 24
$193.9M
$92.9M
Q2 24
$196.3M
$95.7M
Q1 24
$197.1M
$178.7M
Net Profit
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
$-28.9M
$19.0M
Q3 25
$-83.7M
$-300.0K
Q2 25
$-82.3M
$4.0M
Q1 25
$-99.3M
$27.5M
Q4 24
$-87.5M
$15.6M
Q3 24
$-57.7M
$0
Q2 24
$-97.0M
$4.3M
Q1 24
$-97.4M
$27.2M
Gross Margin
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
14.3%
Q3 25
6.8%
Q2 25
8.3%
Q1 25
10.8%
Q4 24
13.9%
Q3 24
13.9%
Q2 24
2.3%
Q1 24
-0.6%
Operating Margin
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
-0.9%
21.5%
Q3 25
-33.1%
6.9%
Q2 25
-31.4%
13.0%
Q1 25
-45.5%
27.0%
Q4 24
-26.0%
22.1%
Q3 24
-21.6%
6.2%
Q2 24
-40.3%
13.0%
Q1 24
-42.9%
24.7%
Net Margin
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
-15.7%
11.8%
Q3 25
-45.1%
-0.3%
Q2 25
-43.4%
3.9%
Q1 25
-55.9%
16.1%
Q4 24
-42.7%
12.2%
Q3 24
-29.8%
Q2 24
-49.4%
4.5%
Q1 24
-49.4%
15.2%
EPS (diluted)
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
$-0.04
$1.05
Q3 25
$-0.12
$-0.02
Q2 25
$-0.12
$0.25
Q1 25
$-0.14
$1.69
Q4 24
$-0.13
$0.97
Q3 24
$-0.08
$0.00
Q2 24
$-0.14
$0.27
Q1 24
$-0.14
$1.69

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$133.9M
$15.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$671.3M
$670.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-392.1M
$609.6M
Total Assets
$968.8M
$2.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.10×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
$133.9M
$15.6M
Q3 25
$125.3M
$14.6M
Q2 25
$107.0M
$8.5M
Q1 25
$171.8M
$10.2M
Q4 24
$216.4M
$6.3M
Q3 24
$115.9M
$6.3M
Q2 24
$141.5M
$2.8M
Q1 24
$180.9M
$6.3M
Total Debt
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
$671.3M
$670.5M
Q3 25
$766.5M
$670.5M
Q2 25
$770.5M
$640.7M
Q1 25
$765.8M
$642.1M
Q4 24
$761.3M
$643.3M
Q3 24
$596.9M
$643.3M
Q2 24
$597.4M
$511.3M
Q1 24
$603.2M
$512.8M
Stockholders' Equity
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
$-392.1M
$609.6M
Q3 25
$-374.5M
$597.2M
Q2 25
$-347.8M
$532.8M
Q1 25
$-288.1M
$534.1M
Q4 24
$-202.1M
$512.5M
Q3 24
$-117.7M
$502.4M
Q2 24
$-72.2M
$508.8M
Q1 24
$936.0K
$510.8M
Total Assets
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
$968.8M
$2.1B
Q3 25
$973.0M
$1.9B
Q2 25
$1.0B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$1.1B
$1.9B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$1.8B
Q3 24
$1.0B
$1.7B
Q2 24
$1.1B
$1.7B
Q1 24
$1.2B
$1.7B
Debt / Equity
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
1.10×
Q3 25
1.12×
Q2 25
1.20×
Q1 25
1.20×
Q4 24
1.26×
Q3 24
1.28×
Q2 24
1.00×
Q1 24
644.43×
1.00×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-18.4M
$21.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-58.3M
$-36.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-31.7%
-22.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
21.7%
35.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.13×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-259.9M
$-53.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
$-18.4M
$21.4M
Q3 25
$-37.1M
$15.6M
Q2 25
$-62.9M
$42.2M
Q1 25
$-47.9M
$52.1M
Q4 24
$37.9M
$23.3M
Q3 24
$-16.9M
$26.1M
Q2 24
$-25.2M
$49.9M
Q1 24
$-73.8M
$26.6M
Free Cash Flow
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
$-58.3M
$-36.3M
Q3 25
$-60.4M
$-39.0M
Q2 25
$-78.6M
$2.0M
Q1 25
$-62.6M
$19.5M
Q4 24
$-70.2M
$-32.3M
Q3 24
$-21.9M
$-31.3M
Q2 24
$-30.8M
$13.2M
Q1 24
$-77.8M
$6.4M
FCF Margin
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
-31.7%
-22.5%
Q3 25
-32.6%
-38.6%
Q2 25
-41.5%
1.9%
Q1 25
-35.3%
11.4%
Q4 24
-34.3%
-25.3%
Q3 24
-11.3%
-33.7%
Q2 24
-15.7%
13.8%
Q1 24
-39.5%
3.6%
Capex Intensity
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
21.7%
35.7%
Q3 25
12.5%
54.0%
Q2 25
8.3%
39.2%
Q1 25
8.3%
19.1%
Q4 24
52.8%
43.6%
Q3 24
2.6%
61.8%
Q2 24
2.9%
38.3%
Q1 24
2.0%
11.3%
Cash Conversion
UP
UP
UTL
UTL
Q4 25
1.13×
Q3 25
Q2 25
10.55×
Q1 25
1.89×
Q4 24
1.49×
Q3 24
Q2 24
11.60×
Q1 24
0.98×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons