vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of United Maritime Corp (USEA) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Viking Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.0B vs $1.8M, roughly 2179.5× United Maritime Corp). United Maritime Corp runs the higher net margin — 59.6% vs 12.9%, a 46.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) is a holding company that is based in the United States and domiciled in Bermuda. It operates three cruise lines as wholly owned subsidiaries: Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises, and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. With its subsidiaries combined, it is the third-largest cruise operator in the world. It is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
USEA vs VIK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8M | $4.0B |
| Net Profit | $1.1M | $514.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 15.2% |
| Net Margin | 59.6% | 12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 35.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $718.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $514.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $439.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-105.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $379.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $159.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | 73.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 74.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.8% |
| Q3 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.5% |
| Q3 25 | 59.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% |
| Q3 25 | $0.13 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.7M | $3.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $49.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $57.5M | $803.5M |
| Total Assets | $144.2M | $11.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.86× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q3 25 | $49.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $57.5M | $803.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $278.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-267.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-688.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.1B |
| Q3 25 | $144.2M | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-444.0K | $663.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-477.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.41× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-444.0K | $663.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $470.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $587.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $828.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $419.8M |
| Q3 25 | $-477.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -26.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -0.41× | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
