vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Venture Global, Inc. (VG) and Wayfair Inc. (W). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Venture Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.4B vs $3.3B, roughly 1.3× Wayfair Inc.). Venture Global, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.8% vs -3.5%, a 30.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Venture Global, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (191.7% vs 6.9%). Wayfair Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($177.0M vs $-1.5B). Over the past eight quarters, Venture Global, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (77.3% CAGR vs 10.6%).
S&P Global Inc. is an American publicly traded corporation headquartered in Manhattan, New York. Its primary areas of business are financial information, analytics, and energy and commodities intelligence. It is the parent company of S&P Global Ratings, S&P Global Energy, S&P Global Market Intelligence, S&P Global Mobility, and the Indian credit rating agency CRISIL. It is also the majority owner of the S&P Dow Jones Indices joint venture. "S&P" is a shortening of "Standard and Poor's".
Wayfair Inc. is an American e-commerce company based in Boston, Massachusetts that sells furniture and home goods online. Formerly known as CSN Stores, it was founded in 2002, and currently offers 14 million items from more than 11,000 global suppliers. The company maintains international operations, including locations in North America and in Canada, Germany, Ireland, China and the United Kingdom.
VG vs W — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.4B | $3.3B |
| Net Profit | $1.2B | $-116.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.3% |
| Operating Margin | 38.7% | 2.5% |
| Net Margin | 26.8% | -3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 191.7% | 6.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.3% | 9.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.41 | $-0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $926.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $-116.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $550.0M | $-99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $475.0M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $517.0M | $-113.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $990.0M | $-128.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-294.0M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $352.0M | $-42.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $698.0M | $-248.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 30.0% |
| Q4 25 | 38.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.3% | -4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.0% | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.6% | -8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.5% | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.9% | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.0% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -31.7% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.8% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.4% | -9.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.41 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $-0.76 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $-0.89 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $-1.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.25 | $-2.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $34.2B | $3.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.7B | $-2.8B |
| Total Assets | $53.4B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 5.07× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $34.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.3B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $-2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $-2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $-2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $-2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $-2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $53.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.5B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | 5.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.1B | $202.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.5B | $177.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -34.1% | 5.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 81.6% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.77× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-6.8B | $464.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $202.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $155.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $273.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $-96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $162.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $245.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $638.0M | $-139.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.5B | $177.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4B | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5B | $260.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.4B | $-101.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $142.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $222.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.4B | $-152.0M |
| Q4 25 | -34.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -42.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -49.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.3% | -3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -167.3% | -5.6% |
| Q4 25 | 81.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 98.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 96.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 119.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 212.4% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.42× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.07× | 18.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.91× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
VG
| Plaquemines Project Segment | $3.4B | 76% |
| Calcasieu Project Segment | $841.0M | 19% |
| Other | $208.0M | 5% |
W
| US Segment | $2.9B | 88% |
| International Segment | $395.0M | 12% |
