vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC. (VIAV) and Bristow Group Inc. (VTOL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($406.8M vs $377.3M, roughly 1.1× Bristow Group Inc.). Bristow Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs 1.6%, a 3.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (42.8% vs 6.7%). Over the past eight quarters, VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.'s revenue compounded faster (27.1% CAGR vs 5.8%).
Viavi Solutions Inc., formerly part of JDS Uniphase Corporation (JDSU), is an American network test, measurement and assurance technology company based in Chandler, Arizona. The company manufactures testing and monitoring equipment for networks. It also develops optical technology used for a range of applications including material quality control, currency anti-counterfeiting and 3D motion sensing, including Microsoft's Kinect video game controller.
Bristow Helicopters Limited is a British civil helicopter operator originally based at Aberdeen Airport, Scotland, which is currently a part of the U.S.-based Bristow Group which in turn has its corporate headquarters in Houston, Texas, U.S. In 2020, Bristow Group was merged with Era Helicopters, a large U.S.-based commercial helicopter operator that was previously a division of Era Aviation, with the two companies then continuing to use the Bristow name.
VIAV vs VTOL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $406.8M | $377.3M |
| Net Profit | $6.4M | $18.4M |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | 1.6% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 42.8% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -76.1% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $0.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $406.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $369.3M | $377.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $299.1M | $386.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $290.5M | $376.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $284.8M | $350.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $270.8M | $353.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.2M | $365.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $359.7M |
| Q1 26 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-48.1M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.4M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0M | $31.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5M | $27.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.1M | $31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.7M | $28.2M |
| Q1 26 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.3% | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.6% | 7.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | $0.61 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $1.72 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.04 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | $0.96 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $500.8M | $286.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | $671.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $846.5M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.28× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $500.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $767.4M | $286.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $545.6M | $245.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $425.3M | $251.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $396.8M | $191.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $509.4M | $247.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $493.1M | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $491.2M | $178.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $671.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $640.5M | $675.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.3M | $705.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $396.1M | $701.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $639.3M | $689.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $637.6M | $629.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $636.0M | $594.2M |
| Q1 26 | $846.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $834.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $723.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.2M | $984.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $728.8M | $931.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $682.8M | $891.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.1M | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.6M | $849.1M |
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.46× | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.88× | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.51× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.54× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.94× | 0.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.91× | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $76.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $47.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $56.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.5M | $76.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.0M | $23.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.8M | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $-603.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.7M | $51.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.5M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.2M | $33.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.9M | $47.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.5M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.3M | $67.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | $-52.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.5M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.4M | $-16.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.5% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | -4.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 14.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.98× | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.40× | -0.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.91× | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
VIAV
Segment breakdown not available.
VTOL
| Offshore Energy Services | $247.5M | 66% |
| Government Services | $100.1M | 27% |
| Other | $21.9M | 6% |
| Related Party | $7.8M | 2% |
