vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Viking Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.0B vs $3.7B, roughly 1.1× W. R. Berkley Corporation). W. R. Berkley Corporation runs the higher net margin — 14.0% vs 12.9%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) is a holding company that is based in the United States and domiciled in Bermuda. It operates three cruise lines as wholly owned subsidiaries: Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises, and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. With its subsidiaries combined, it is the third-largest cruise operator in the world. It is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

William Robert Berkley is the founder and current chairman of W. R. Berkley Corporation and the chairman of the New York University Board of Trustees.

VIK vs WRB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
VIK
VIK
1.1× larger
VIK
$4.0B
$3.7B
WRB
Higher net margin
WRB
WRB
1.1% more per $
WRB
14.0%
12.9%
VIK

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Revenue
$4.0B
$3.7B
Net Profit
$514.0M
$515.2M
Gross Margin
73.4%
Operating Margin
15.2%
Net Margin
12.9%
14.0%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
35.4%
23.4%
EPS (diluted)
$1.15
$1.31

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$3.7B
Q4 25
$3.7B
Q3 25
$4.0B
$3.8B
Q2 25
$2.3B
$3.7B
Q1 25
$718.2M
$3.5B
Q4 24
$3.7B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$3.4B
Q2 24
$2.1B
$3.3B
Net Profit
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$515.2M
Q4 25
$449.5M
Q3 25
$514.0M
$511.0M
Q2 25
$439.2M
$401.3M
Q1 25
$-105.5M
$417.6M
Q4 24
$576.1M
Q3 24
$379.7M
$365.6M
Q2 24
$159.8M
$371.9M
Gross Margin
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
73.4%
Q2 25
55.7%
Q1 25
17.3%
Q4 24
Q3 24
74.7%
Q2 24
57.8%
Operating Margin
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
15.4%
Q3 25
15.2%
17.2%
Q2 25
23.7%
14.2%
Q1 25
-1.3%
15.2%
Q4 24
19.9%
Q3 24
13.6%
14.0%
Q2 24
20.5%
14.7%
Net Margin
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
14.0%
Q4 25
12.1%
Q3 25
12.9%
13.6%
Q2 25
19.1%
10.9%
Q1 25
-14.7%
11.8%
Q4 24
15.7%
Q3 24
10.6%
10.8%
Q2 24
7.7%
11.2%
EPS (diluted)
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$1.31
Q4 25
$1.13
Q3 25
$1.15
$1.28
Q2 25
$0.99
$1.00
Q1 25
$-0.24
$1.04
Q4 24
$0.89
Q3 24
$0.87
$0.91
Q2 24
$0.38
$0.92

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$3.0B
$2.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$803.5M
Total Assets
$11.5B
$44.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$2.1B
Q4 25
$2.5B
Q3 25
$3.0B
$2.4B
Q2 25
$2.6B
$2.0B
Q1 25
$2.8B
$1.7B
Q4 24
$2.0B
Q3 24
$2.4B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$1.8B
$1.6B
Stockholders' Equity
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$9.7B
Q3 25
$803.5M
$9.8B
Q2 25
$278.3M
$9.3B
Q1 25
$-267.5M
$8.9B
Q4 24
$8.4B
Q3 24
$-688.9M
$8.4B
Q2 24
$-1.1B
$7.8B
Total Assets
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
$44.3B
Q4 25
$44.1B
Q3 25
$11.5B
$43.7B
Q2 25
$11.1B
$42.7B
Q1 25
$10.7B
$41.3B
Q4 24
$40.6B
Q3 24
$40.4B
Q2 24
$38.9B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$663.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.29×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$995.1M
Q3 25
$663.9M
$1.1B
Q2 25
$470.7M
$703.8M
Q1 25
$587.9M
$743.8M
Q4 24
$810.0M
Q3 24
$828.7M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$419.8M
$881.3M
Cash Conversion
VIK
VIK
WRB
WRB
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.21×
Q3 25
1.29×
2.23×
Q2 25
1.07×
1.75×
Q1 25
1.78×
Q4 24
1.41×
Q3 24
2.18×
3.39×
Q2 24
2.63×
2.37×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons