vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Verisign (VRSN) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($625.1M vs $425.3M, roughly 1.5× Verisign). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 13.4%, a 35.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 7.6%). Verisign produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.1M vs $140.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 4.6%).
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
VRSN vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $425.3M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $206.2M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 88.5% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 67.0% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 48.5% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.6% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.7% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $425.3M | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $419.1M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $409.9M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $402.3M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.4M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.6M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $387.1M | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $384.3M | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | $206.2M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.8M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.4M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $199.3M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $191.5M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.3M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.8M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $194.1M | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | 88.5% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.4% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 88.0% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.7% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 87.8% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 88.0% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 87.8% | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 87.2% | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | 67.0% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.8% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.4% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.7% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.9% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 68.8% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.4% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | 48.5% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.5% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $580.5M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-2.2B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $580.5M | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $617.7M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $593.8M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $648.5M | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $599.9M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $644.9M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $689.9M | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $924.7M | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $2.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $289.6M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $285.1M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 67.0% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.1B | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $289.6M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.7M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $202.5M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $291.3M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $231.5M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.4M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.4M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $257.3M | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | $285.1M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $303.0M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.7M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.5M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $222.0M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $247.8M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $151.2M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $253.5M | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | 67.0% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 72.3% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 56.1% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.4% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.1% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 66.0% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.40× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.45× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.21× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.26× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.81× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.33× | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.