vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Weyerhaeuser (WY) and ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (ZION). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Weyerhaeuser is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $891.0M, roughly 1.7× ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION runs the higher net margin — 29.5% vs 4.8%, a 24.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs -9.8%). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION produced more free cash flow last quarter ($952.0M vs $-128.0M). Over the past eight quarters, ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION's revenue compounded faster (9.6% CAGR vs -7.4%).
The Weyerhaeuser Company is an American timberland company which owns approximately 10,400,000 acres of timberlands in the U.S., and manages an additional 14,000,000 acres of timberlands under long-term licenses in Canada. The company has manufactured wood products for over a century. It operates as a real estate investment trust (REIT).
Zions Bancorporation is an American national bank headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. It operates as a national bank rather than as a bank holding company and does business under the following seven brands: Zions Bank, Amegy Bank of Texas, California Bank and Trust, National Bank of Arizona, Nevada State Bank, Vectra Bank Colorado, and the Commerce Bank of Washington.
WY vs ZION — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $891.0M |
| Net Profit | $74.0M | $263.0M |
| Gross Margin | 10.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.8% | 29.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.8% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -8.6% | 21.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $1.77 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $891.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $861.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $838.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $795.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $820.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $792.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $777.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $742.0M |
| Q4 25 | $74.0M | $263.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0M | $222.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.0M | $244.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.0M | $216.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $214.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | $201.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $114.0M | $153.0M |
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | 20.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $1.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $1.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $1.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $1.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $1.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.16 | $0.96 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $464.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.6B | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.4B | $7.2B |
| Total Assets | $16.6B | $89.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $464.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $401.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $592.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $560.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $684.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $877.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $997.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $871.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $970.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $964.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $950.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $548.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $546.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $544.0M |
| Q4 25 | $9.4B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.4B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1B | $5.8B |
| Q4 25 | $16.6B | $89.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.7B | $88.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.5B | $88.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5B | $88.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5B | $88.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7B | $87.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8B | $87.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.8B | $87.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.52× | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-114.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-128.0M | $952.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.3% | 106.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 13.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -1.54× | 4.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $511.0M | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-114.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.0M | $438.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.0M | $-62.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.0M | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.0M | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.0M | $251.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.0M | $261.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-128.0M | $952.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.0M | $413.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $388.0M | $-93.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.0M | $152.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $205.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $226.0M | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.0M | $234.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.0M | $231.0M |
| Q4 25 | -8.3% | 106.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.6% | -11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | 128.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.4% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.8% | 30.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.7% | 31.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | -1.54× | 4.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.63× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.55× | -0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.84× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.69× | 5.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.36× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.50× | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.09× | 1.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
