vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of XBP Global Holdings, Inc. (XBP) and ZIPRECRUITER, INC. (ZIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
XBP Global Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($152.4M vs $111.7M, roughly 1.4× ZIPRECRUITER, INC.). ZIPRECRUITER, INC. runs the higher net margin — -0.7% vs -200.7%, a 199.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ZIPRECRUITER, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.6% vs -34.7%). XBP Global Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.5M vs $7.6M).
ZipRecruiter, Inc. is an American employment marketplace for job seekers and employers.
XBP vs ZIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $152.4M | $111.7M |
| Net Profit | $-305.8M | $-835.0K |
| Gross Margin | 21.7% | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | -191.7% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | -200.7% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -34.7% | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -980.1% | 92.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.60 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $111.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $152.4M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $112.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.4M | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $123.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $122.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-835.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-305.8M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.3M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-6.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | 89.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 89.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.9% | 89.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -191.7% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -200.7% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.1% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.60 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.5M | $188.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $381.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $130.5M | $-77.2M |
| Total Assets | $947.9M | $569.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.92× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $188.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.5M | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $203.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $221.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $218.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $271.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $282.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $381.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.5M | $-76.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-65.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3B | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $569.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $947.9M | $573.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $629.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $664.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.6M | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $665.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $662.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $13.9M | $7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $10.5M | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.9% | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.2% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.1M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
XBP
| Related And Non Related Party | $136.5M | 90% |
| Technology | $8.2M | 5% |
| Other | $5.7M | 4% |
| Deferred Revenue As Of July312025 | $1.9M | 1% |
ZIP
| License | $84.3M | 75% |
| Services | $27.4M | 25% |
